Re: FreeType 2.7.1

2017-01-13 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Matthieu Herrb: > In my analysis of the changed symbols, only a minor bump was required, > but now that people have started installing libfreetype.so.28.0, > commit it like that. FWIW, I run such testing bulk builds without plist registration, don't upload the resulting packages, and wipe the aff

Re: FreeType 2.7.1

2017-01-13 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:17:02PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > > On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote: > >> Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment. > > > >> As usu

Re: FreeType 2.7.1

2017-01-12 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Stuart Henderson: > > And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build. > > i386 bulk was clean. amd64 also looks fine. (iridium and chromium are still building on their n-th try...) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: FreeType 2.7.1

2017-01-12 Thread David Coppa
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote: >> Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment. > >> As usual, please test it. >> >> And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build.

Re: FreeType 2.7.1

2017-01-12 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote: > Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment. > As usual, please test it. > > And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build. i386 bulk was clean.

Re: FreeType 2.7.1

2017-01-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/01/09 15:29, David Coppa wrote: > > Hi all, > > Here's the update to freetype-2.7.1, both inline and as attachment. > > As usual, please test it. > > And, if you can, put it in your next bulk build. I'll start an i386 bulk tomorrow.