Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:20:00AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 03:00:19AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > The code doesn't fully initialize the structure, which was extended to
> > > include a flags member at some point. Since the pending inteld
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:20:00AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 03:00:19AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The code doesn't fully initialize the structure, which was extended to
> > include a flags member at some point. Since the pending inteldrm
> > update uses that flags
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 03:00:19AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The code doesn't fully initialize the structure, which was extended to
> include a flags member at some point. Since the pending inteldrm
> update uses that flags member, the DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MMAP ioctl
> starts randomly failing be
The code doesn't fully initialize the structure, which was extended to
include a flags member at some point. Since the pending inteldrm
update uses that flags member, the DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MMAP ioctl
starts randomly failing because the flags member contains stack
garbage. The diff below fixes th
