On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:01:53PM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while reading through uvm code I stubled accross a piece of code that
> > appears to be buggy. Here's the proposed patch, rational follows:
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> while reading through uvm code I stubled accross a piece of code that
> appears to be buggy. Here's the proposed patch, rational follows:
>
> Index: uvm_vnode.c
> =
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 06:51:31PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while reading through uvm code I stubled accross a piece of code that
> appears to be buggy. Here's the proposed patch, rational follows:
>
> Index: uvm_vnode.c
>
Hi,
while reading through uvm code I stubled accross a piece of code that
appears to be buggy. Here's the proposed patch, rational follows:
Index: uvm_vnode.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/uvm/uvm_vnode.c,v
retrieving revision 1.71
diff
