> If you feel bold, you can still put it in for 6.0, it's a bugfix
> after all, and i don't consider it very dangerous. Then again,
> if you want to be extra cautious, nothing would be wrong with
> waiting until after unlock, either.
that's the right attitude. Around at least every 4-5 hours for
Hi Martijn,
Martijn van Duren wrote on Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:36:22PM +0200:
> Here's a second jab at implementing REG_STARTEND in ed.
> This patch just focusses on getting REG_STARTEND in there
> and the general restructuring that comes with it.
Sorry for taking so long, but i finally got roun
anyone?
On 06/28/16 15:00, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> ping
>
> On 06/18/16 11:13, Martijn van Duren wrote:
>> Hello tech@,
>>
>> Here's a second jab at implementing REG_STARTEND in ed. This patch just
>> focusses on getting REG_STARTEND in there and the general restructuring
>> that comes with i
ping
On 06/18/16 11:13, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Hello tech@,
>
> Here's a second jab at implementing REG_STARTEND in ed. This patch just
> focusses on getting REG_STARTEND in there and the general restructuring
> that comes with it.
> This fixes the begin of word bug similar to sed.
> (Also f
Hello tech@,
Here's a second jab at implementing REG_STARTEND in ed. This patch just
focusses on getting REG_STARTEND in there and the general restructuring
that comes with it.
This fixes the begin of word bug similar to sed.
(Also fix a wrong comment while here)
No other changes intended.
OK?
Hi Martijn,
Martijn van Duren wrote on Sun, May 29, 2016 at 03:18:57PM +0200:
> 1) It removes the isbinary test and the accompanying
> NUL_TO_NEWLINE/NEWLINE_TO_NUL conversions. If a NUL-byte is found in a
> text ed detects it as a binary file and converts every NUL to a newline
> prior to doing
Here's an updated diff based on a comment I found in vi's substitute
code.
When a 0-length match is found directly on the position where the
previous non-0-length match ended it should skip that match.
Consider the following:
text: aabb
command: s/a*/X/g
without check: XXbXbX
with check: XbXbX
T
Hello tech@,
Here's a first attempt at fixing the begin of word bug as also found in
sed. It does a little more then I initially sed^ht out to do, but I also
found some other unexpected behaviour.
1) It removes the isbinary test and the accompanying
NUL_TO_NEWLINE/NEWLINE_TO_NUL conversions. If a
