Hey Ted,
I should have been more clear in my previous email, but would it be
possible
to also revert OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER back to 0x1000107fL (or
0x1000108fL)?
This way LibreSSL would work as a drop-in replacement without
applications
needing to add explicit support for LibreSSL.
Ideas ar
> CCLD openssl
>../crypto/.libs/libcrypto.so: undefined reference to `clock_gettime'
>collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>make[1]: *** [openssl] Error 1
>
>Setting LDFLAGS to -lrt fixes the issue.
Rather than LDFLAGS, it should be in LDADD/LIBADD.
--8<--
Subject: build: resolve link-time fa
>The first release of LibreSSL portable has been released. LibreSSL
>can be found in the LibreSSL directory of your favorite OpenBSD
>mirror.
>
>http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL has it, and other
>mirrors will soon.
>
>libressl-2.0.0.tar.gz has been tested to build on various versions
>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM, tekk wrote:
> Thanks Bob and all the other LibreSSL hackers.
Thanks - While I seem to have been quasi defaulted into the public
face for this thing (probably due to size and volume) I hope you can
emphasize the "all the other hackers". Yes, I've done a lot of wor
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:07:10PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > it. As expected, OPENSSL does the opposite and makes life harder for
> > everyone.
>
> Hasn't this been the OpenSSL roadmap since the very beginning?
Jury is still out as whether they did it on purpose, or whether it was
just a side
Thanks Bob and all the other LibreSSL hackers.
Just switched my slackware 14.1 box over to libressl instead of openssl and
it's working great so far, no problems at all.
> it. As expected, OPENSSL does the opposite and makes life harder for
> everyone.
Hasn't this been the OpenSSL roadmap since the very beginning?
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 00:22, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> Hey Bob,
>
>> It's already fixed, so will be on the next tarball roll
>
> Thanks!
>
> I should have been more clear in my previous email, but would it be possible
> to also revert OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER back to 0x1000107fL (or 0x1000108fL)?
>
Hey Bob,
It's already fixed, so will be on the next tarball roll
Thanks!
I should have been more clear in my previous email, but would it be possible
to also revert OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER back to 0x1000107fL (or 0x1000108fL)?
This way LibreSSL would work as a drop-in replacement without app
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:21:12PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> The first release of LibreSSL portable has been released. LibreSSL
> can be found in the LibreSSL directory of your favorite OpenBSD mirror.
>
> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL has it, and other mirrors
sounds great!
W
It's already fixed, so will be on the next tarball roll
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Piotr Sikora wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>> libressl-2.0.0.tar.gz has been tested to build on various versions of
>> Linux, Solaris, Mac OSX, and FreeBSD.
>>
>> This is intended as an initial release to allow the com
Hello,
libressl-2.0.0.tar.gz has been tested to build on various versions of
Linux, Solaris, Mac OSX, and FreeBSD.
This is intended as an initial release to allow the community to start
using and providing feedback. We will be adding support for
other platforms as time and resources permit.
C
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:21:12 -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> The first release of LibreSSL portable has been released. LibreSSL
> can be found in the LibreSSL directory of your favorite OpenBSD mirror.
>
> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL has it, and other mirrors
> will soon.
>
> libress
The first release of LibreSSL portable has been released. LibreSSL
can be found in the LibreSSL directory of your favorite OpenBSD mirror.
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL has it, and other mirrors
will soon.
libressl-2.0.0.tar.gz has been tested to build on various versions of
Linux,
14 matches
Mail list logo
