On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Ted Unangst :
>> "Open source projects
>>
>> Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
>> pool in their default setup"
> ", but we ask that you get a vendor zone when using the pool as a default"
>
> But Th
2009/7/22 Ted Unangst :
> "Open source projects
>
> Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
> pool in their default setup"
", but we ask that you get a vendor zone when using the pool as a default"
But Theo has spoken.
Best
Martin
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 01:07:42PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jean Rebiffe wrote:
> > To OpenNTPD developers,
> >
> > You use pool.ntp.org in the default configuration of the OpenNTPD
> > daemon since 2004, but that is not compliant with the web page of
> > the po
We don't intend to change anything.
Their decrees are meaningless. They don't provide the ntp traffic,
they only provide DNS records. As written, those rules are designed
to let the people at ntp.org impose a punishing policy against those
they don't like.
Those rules do not improve time distri
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Jean Rebiffe wrote:
> > Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
> > pool in their default setup, but we ask that you get a vendor zone
> > when using the pool as a default configuration.
they obviously don't mean that if it's taken them
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jean Rebiffe wrote:
> To OpenNTPD developers,
>
> You use pool.ntp.org in the default configuration of the OpenNTPD
> daemon since 2004, but that is not compliant with the web page of
> the pool.ntp.org project designated to software vendors and operating
> system
To OpenNTPD developers,
You use pool.ntp.org in the default configuration of the OpenNTPD
daemon since 2004, but that is not compliant with the web page of
the pool.ntp.org project designated to software vendors and operating
system vendors, http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/vendors.html :
> You must ab