Ted Unangst wrote [2011-11-14 22:35+0100]:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso wrote:
> > Is there a reason not to use CTASSERT (and some kind of
> > member_sizeof())? I couldn't find just any discussion on that in
> > marc and gmane.
>
> Seems like a good idea, but your patch is wrong
ounts so much,
> i wonder why compile-time assertions are not used at all (AFAIK).
> I.e., the simple change in that POC patch below saves 76 bytes on
> a i386. (And that is only on-disk.)
>
> Is there a reason not to use CTASSERT (and some kind of
> member_sizeof())? I couldn&#
Hi,
my dhclient.c patch was very wrong.
And it (falsely) removed a runtime check of some struct member
size. But this very hunk (while wrong) led me to a question.
Since saving even some bytes in shell scripts counts so much,
i wonder why compile-time assertions are not used at all (AFAIK).
I.e
