Re: CARP load balancing

2009-10-15 Thread P-O Yliniemi
Marco Pfatschbacher skrev 2009-10-15 09:49: On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:15:05AM +0200, P-O Yliniemi wrote: Thanks for this quick and easy solution. So instead of the old way of configuring CARP (multiple interfaces with the same address on each machine), we will have to use carpnode

Re: CARP load balancing

2009-10-15 Thread Marco Pfatschbacher
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:15:05AM +0200, P-O Yliniemi wrote: > > > Thanks for this quick and easy solution. So instead of the old way of > configuring CARP (multiple interfaces with the same address on each > machine), we will have to use carpnodes, which when explained is much > more simple

Re: CARP load balancing

2009-10-14 Thread P-O Yliniemi
Marco Pfatschbacher skrev 2009-10-12 23:39: On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:24:49PM +0200, P-O Yliniemi wrote: Hi, The CARP section (6.11) in the FAQ is incorrect (old), so I'm asking for a solution here on the list. Hi, yes, the faq is outdated. see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrad

Re: CARP load balancing

2009-10-12 Thread Marco Pfatschbacher
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 01:24:49PM +0200, P-O Yliniemi wrote: > Hi, > > The CARP section (6.11) in the FAQ is incorrect (old), so I'm asking for > a solution here on the list. Hi, yes, the faq is outdated. see http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade43.html#carp The manpage, however has all the in

CARP load balancing

2009-10-12 Thread P-O Yliniemi
Hi, The CARP section (6.11) in the FAQ is incorrect (old), so I'm asking for a solution here on the list. I want to set up a similar configuration as the FAQ describes, with the IP-address being the only difference: server a ip: 10.5.0.2 server b ip: 10.5.0.3 load balanced ip: 10.5.0.200