> CVSROOT: /cvs
> Module name: src
> Changes by: s...@cvs.openbsd.org 2014/12/16 14:02:58
> Modified files:
> sys/arch/amd64/amd64: identcpu.c
> sys/arch/amd64/include: specialreg.h
>
> Log message:
> Define and print HV cpuid flag.
> This is set by many hypervisors, including kvm, vmware, hyper-v.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 23:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >
> > Only in order to get a flags field that can be tweaked with config(8). And
> > to allow disable via config(8), though that could also be achieved with a
> > flag.
> >
> > Tweaking the behavior
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:21:35 +0100 (CET)
> > From: Stefan Fritsch
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Alexey Suslikov
> > > > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
> > > >
> > > > Stefan
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:21:35 +0100 (CET)
> From: Stefan Fritsch
>
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> > > From: Alexey Suslikov
> > > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
> > >
> > > Stefan Fritsch sfritsch.de> writes:
> > >
> > > > --- a/sys/arch/amd64/include/specia
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 23:55, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
> Only in order to get a flags field that can be tweaked with config(8). And
> to allow disable via config(8), though that could also be achieved with a
> flag.
>
> Tweaking the behavior with a flags value is necessary because hypervisors
> n
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 00:32, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
> > --- a/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> > +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ isa0 at amdpcib?
> > isa0at tcpcib?
> > pci*at mainbus0
> >
> > +paravirt0 at ma
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 00:32, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> --- a/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ isa0at amdpcib?
> isa0 at tcpcib?
> pci* at mainbus0
>
> +paravirt0 at mainbus0
> +
> acpi0 at bios0
> acpitimer*at acpi?
> acpihp
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Alexey Suslikov
> > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
> >
> > Stefan Fritsch sfritsch.de> writes:
> >
> > > --- a/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> > > +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> > > -158,6 +158,7
> >
> > From: Alexey Suslikov
> > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
> >
> > Stefan Fritsch sfritsch.de> writes:
> >
> > > --- a/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> > > +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> > > -158,6 +158,7
> > > #define CPUIDECX_AVX0x1000
> From: Alexey Suslikov
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:51:14 + (UTC)
>
> Stefan Fritsch sfritsch.de> writes:
>
> > --- a/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> > +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> > -158,6 +158,7
> > #defineCPUIDECX_AVX0x1000 /* Advanced Vec
Stefan Fritsch sfritsch.de> writes:
> --- a/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> +++ b/sys/arch/amd64/include/specialreg.h
> -158,6 +158,7
> #define CPUIDECX_AVX0x1000 /* Advanced Vector Extensions
*/
> #define CPUIDECX_F16C 0x2000 /* 16bit fp conve
On Thursday 11 December 2014 22:20:06, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > For the codepatching part, the most interesting files are
> > codepatch.c and codepatch.h. In copy.S and cpu.c, I convert the
> > code patching already done for SMAP to
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in summer, I posted some paravirt patches for amd64. In response to the
> comments I received then, I have created some infrastructure to binary
> patch kernel code during boot. In order to get some feedback, I am posting
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 00:52:44, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> I assume we still need this:
> printf 'change paravirt0\ny\n\n0x8\nq\n' | config -ef /bsd
> under Illumos?
Correct
> in summer, I posted some paravirt patches for amd64. In response to the
> comments I received then, I have created some infrastructure to binary
> patch kernel code during boot. In order to get some feedback, I am posting
> the whole paravirt & code patching diff here. Also, KVM users may be
Hi,
in summer, I posted some paravirt patches for amd64. In response to the
comments I received then, I have created some infrastructure to binary
patch kernel code during boot. In order to get some feedback, I am posting
the whole paravirt & code patching diff here. Also, KVM users may be
int
16 matches
Mail list logo