Re: Adding POSIX c99 compiler wrapper script

2022-02-11 Thread Theo de Raadt
Joe Nelson wrote: > I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper. > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html > > Is it missing because the community feels it's ill conceived, or just > because nobody stepped up to implement it? If the latter, I can > c

Re: Adding POSIX c99 compiler wrapper script

2022-02-11 Thread Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:30:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2022/02/11 16:13, Joe Nelson wrote: > > > > I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper. > > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html > > > > Is it missing because the community fee

Re: Adding POSIX c99 compiler wrapper script

2022-02-11 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 04:13:22PM -0600, Joe Nelson wrote: > > I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper. > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html "[CD] C-Language Development Utilities  The functionality described is optional." I don't see the

Re: Adding POSIX c99 compiler wrapper script

2022-02-11 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/11 16:13, Joe Nelson wrote: > > I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper. > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html > > Is it missing because the community feels it's ill conceived, or just > because nobody stepped up to implement it? If