On 01.05.2017 12:28, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Vyukov
>> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:43:26 +0200
>>
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Greg Steuck wrote:
>>> I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0
>>> port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I was immediatel
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Vyukov
>> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:43:26 +0200
>>
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Greg Steuck wrote:
>> > I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0
>> > port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I
> From: Dmitry Vyukov
> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:43:26 +0200
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Greg Steuck wrote:
> > I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0
> > port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I was immediately greeted with:
> > clang-4.0: error: unsup
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Greg Steuck wrote:
> I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0
> port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I was immediately greeted with:
> clang-4.0: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=address' for target
> 'amd64-unknown-openbsd6
I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0
port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I was immediately greeted with:
clang-4.0: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=address' for target
'amd64-unknown-openbsd6.1'
How deep a rat hole does one have to go to port ASan to