Re: ARP reply towards MP-safeness

2015-10-26 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 07:08:19PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > This rewrites the code to send an ARP reply to no use ``myaddr''. The > goal is to get rid of the per-ifp address list iterations. > > Instead do two route lookups. > > ok? Should the "reply:" label stay before the "if (op != AR

ARP reply towards MP-safeness

2015-10-26 Thread Martin Pieuchot
This rewrites the code to send an ARP reply to no use ``myaddr''. The goal is to get rid of the per-ifp address list iterations. Instead do two route lookups. ok? Index: netinet/if_ether.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/if_ethe