Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-29 Thread pancake
Hi, inlined reply On 27/10/2011, at 18:44, Ted Unangst wrote: > Uh, actually there are two licenses in that file. The BSD license only > has 3 clauses. The first license does have 4 clauses, but not all > licenses with 4 clauses are BSD licenses. Did the debian dudes read the > license and de

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-27 Thread pancake
Sorry for the lag and the silence. I've been pretty busy and was unable to reply in this thread. There was a confussion with the bug report that I want to clarify. In radare2 I took libc/regex and usr.bin/file from the OpenBSD CVS. I was looking for some smart implementations of regex and magi

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-27 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Pancake, pancake wrote on Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM +0200: > Sorry for the lag and the silence. I've been pretty busy and was > unable to reply in this thread. No problem with the delay, your time is your own to spend. However, i'm not sure this discussion is apropriate on tech@. You a

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-27 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011, pancake wrote: > The problem I'm facing now is in libr/util/regex which is the imported > version of OpenBSD's lib/libc/regex. > > The issue was reported by the Debian maintainer of r2 and it's a license > issue. > > http://radare.org/cgi-bin/hg/radare2/file/41de633fa424/l

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-15 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Ted Unangst wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:29:40PM -0400: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: >> On 14 October 2011 17:19, Ted Unangst wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011, Edd Barrett wrote: A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian dev who

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-14 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: > On 14 October 2011 17:19, Ted Unangst wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011, Edd Barrett wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian >>> dev who was packaging this thinks he has spotted a license bug.

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-14 Thread Edd Barrett
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 04:19:58PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > > A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian > > dev who was packaging this thinks he has spotted a license bug. > > > > Said I would forward his mail onto OpenBSD, so here it is. > > > > Discuss. > > What COPY

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-14 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, Edd Barrett wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:13:52PM +0100: > From: pancake >> Debian packager has reported a bug in magic license. >> >> COPYRIGHT file contains the 4th clause bsd There is no COPYRIGHT file in the OpenBSD file(1) source directory. So, i'm not 100% sure what you are talkin

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-14 Thread Christiano F. Haesbaert
On 14 October 2011 17:19, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011, Edd Barrett wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian >> dev who was packaging this thinks he has spotted a license bug. >> >> Said I would forward his mail onto OpenBSD, so here i

Re: [panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-14 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011, Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi guys, > > A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian > dev who was packaging this thinks he has spotted a license bug. > > Said I would forward his mail onto OpenBSD, so here it is. > > Discuss. What COPYRIGHT file? There's n

[panc...@nopcode.org: License]

2011-10-14 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi guys, A port I am maintaining uses our file(1) implementation. A debian dev who was packaging this thinks he has spotted a license bug. Said I would forward his mail onto OpenBSD, so here it is. Discuss. - Forwarded message from pancake - Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 01:19:26 +0200 From: