On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 18:50, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> But if you like OpenRCS as it is and don't want to get any diffs unless
> security fixes, then just say it.
> Or if you work on other stuff and you don't have time for that, then just
> say it.
Personally, I don't much like to see diffs "f
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 06:01:52PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
> Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
>
> > Hi tech,
>
> Hi,
>
> > if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this:
> > - comparison between signed and unsigned
> > - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
> >
On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 12:35:11PM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> > On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mi
Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
> Hi tech,
Hi,
> if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this:
> - comparison between signed and unsigned
> - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
>
> I'm not quite sure if the typecasts are at the correct place, but these diffs
> removes the w
On 9 May 2014 11:47, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>>> > Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
>>> >
>>> > [..
On 9 May 2014 11:41, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
>> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>> > Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
>> >
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > > Does no one want to check the diff and g
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
> > Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback?
> >
> > Regardless of the conte
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:05:35PM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
> Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback?
>
> Regardless of the content of your diff, the date of your mail was:
>
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:57:57 +0
Fritjof Bornebusch writes:
[...]
> Does no one want to check the diff and give me some feedback?
Regardless of the content of your diff, the date of your mail was:
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:57:57 +0200
I doubt there are developers that are paid full-time to improve rcs,
please be more patien
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:57:57PM +0200, Fritjof Bornebusch wrote:
> Hi tech,
>
> if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this:
> - comparison between signed and unsigned
> - signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
>
> I'm not quite sure if the typecasts are at the correct pl
Hi tech,
if I compile rcs, gcc prints a few warnings like this:
- comparison between signed and unsigned
- signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
I'm not quite sure if the typecasts are at the correct place, but these diffs
removes the warnings.
fritjof
Index: buf.c
==
11 matches
Mail list logo
