On 10/10/17 23:31, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:52:42PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:46:22AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:57:25PM -0700, Carlos Cardenas wrote:
Destroy switch on `vmctl reload` to allow SIOCBRDGADD to
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:52:42PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:46:22AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:57:25PM -0700, Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> > > Destroy switch on `vmctl reload` to allow SIOCBRDGADD to succeed
> > > when creating new bridge an
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:46:22AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:57:25PM -0700, Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> > Destroy switch on `vmctl reload` to allow SIOCBRDGADD to succeed
> > when creating new bridge and attaching interfaces to it.
> >
> > Comments? Ok?
>
> I don't thi
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 03:57:25PM -0700, Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> Destroy switch on `vmctl reload` to allow SIOCBRDGADD to succeed
> when creating new bridge and attaching interfaces to it.
>
> Comments? Ok?
I don't think it is a good idea to destroy and recreate bridge interfaces
on every reloa
Destroy switch on `vmctl reload` to allow SIOCBRDGADD to succeed
when creating new bridge and attaching interfaces to it.
Comments? Ok?
diff --git usr.sbin/vmd/priv.c usr.sbin/vmd/priv.c
index ef42549d105..0190c049837 100644
--- usr.sbin/vmd/priv.c
+++ usr.sbin/vmd/priv.c
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ priv_d