Le mer. 16 août 2023, 12:50, Stuart Henderson a
écrit :
> On 2023/08/15 18:16, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > Did I do something wrong and should send it to another list, CC someone
> or
> > did I do something stupid? 64-bit incompat feature is enabled on new
> ext4's
> > by default, at
On 2023/08/15 18:16, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Did I do something wrong and should send it to another list, CC someone or
> did I do something stupid? 64-bit incompat feature is enabled on new ext4's
> by default, at least on Ubuntu
It's the right list. However as ext2fs support is no
Did I do something wrong and should send it to another list, CC someone or
did I do something stupid? 64-bit incompat feature is enabled on new ext4's
by default, at least on Ubuntu
Le lun. 3 juil. 2023, 02:49, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello, all attached pat
Ping?
Le lun. 3 juil. 2023, 02:49, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <
phco...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello, all attached patch implements feature 64-bit for ext2. This was
> enabled implicitly on my Ubuntu and probably on many other systems. Since
> it's an incompat feature lack of its support preve
Hello, all attached patch implements feature 64-bit for ext2. This was
enabled implicitly on my Ubuntu and probably on many other systems. Since
it's an incompat feature lack of its support prevented the mount
altogether. With this patch I was able to load install sets from my Ubuntu
partition.
dif
