Re: /etc/security

ust to >>> keep services tidy and separated. Some of these have to connect to ssh >>> servers, therefore they require a .ssh/known_hosts. /etc/security thinks >>> this is a security risk and complains about it every night... >> I think the basic idea makes sense. >&g

Re: /etc/security

ave to connect to ssh > > servers, therefore they require a .ssh/known_hosts. /etc/security thinks > > this is a security risk and complains about it every night... > > I think the basic idea makes sense. > > The file name still in use for backward compatibility, > ".ssh

Re: /etc/security

Tobias Ulmer wrote on Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 02:36:43AM +0100: > I've got a bunch of "users" with no password/no way to log in, just to > keep services tidy and separated. Some of these have to connect to ssh > servers, therefore they require a .ssh/known_hosts. /etc/sec

/etc/security

I've got a bunch of "users" with no password/no way to log in, just to keep services tidy and separated. Some of these have to connect to ssh servers, therefore they require a .ssh/known_hosts. /etc/security thinks this is a security risk and complains about it every night... Inde

Re: /etc/security - patch for don't count lost+found in /var/mail

Hi Daniel, > /etc/security complains about the lost+found directory in /var/mail. > Here is a diff to ignore a lost+found named directory in /var/mail: Umm, i'm not convinced ignoring debris left over from file system repair in /var/mail is a sane default. Being reminded to clean

/etc/security - patch for don't count lost+found in /var/mail

Hi! /etc/security complains about the lost+found directory in /var/mail. Here is a diff to ignore a lost+found named directory in /var/mail: --- security.orig Wed Aug 13 00:51:28 2008 +++ securitySun Nov 1 09:04:48 2009 @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ fi # Mailboxes should be owned by user and