pf.c Pflow TOS zeroed out

Hi, We've been maintaining this small patch since 5.8 and it seems to work as expected but could be wrong. Unpatched Behaviour: * netflow always shows TOS values as 0 Patched behaviour: * netflow now shows a TOS value when either set by the PF rule, or if packet originally had the Index

Re: Brainy: User-Triggerable Kernel Memory Leak in execve()

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 22:49:50 +0200 shun.obsd.t...@dropcut.net wrote: > Hi Maxime, > Hi Sam, > > I have been following this thread (and others) for some time. > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 09:55:21PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote: > > Well, I guess I'll have to ad

Re: Brainy: User-Triggerable Kernel Memory Leak in execve()

t matter. > > > Le 21/07/2015 12:31, sam a écrit : > > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:31:44 +0200 > > Maxime Villard wrote: > > > >> Found by The Brainy Code Scanner. > >> > >> It is not the last bug Brainy has found, but it is the last one I >

Re: Brainy: User-Triggerable Kernel Memory Leak in execve()

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:31:44 +0200 Maxime Villard wrote: > Found by The Brainy Code Scanner. > > It is not the last bug Brainy has found, but it is the last one I > report. I don't have time for that. > How about you release the Brainy Code Scanner then? "I have so many bugs; in fact, there a

Re: Brainy: Kernel Use-after-free & Memory Leak in hifn

On Mon, 11 May 2015 22:11:10 +0200 Maxime Villard wrote: > Hi, > I put here two bugs among others: > > sys/dev/pci/hifn7751.c > > > 2757 > if (!(m0->m_flags & M_EXT)) > m_freem(m0); > len = MCLBYTES; > > totlen -

Re: Typo in Tetris

Well, I've learned something today. Apologies for the noise. On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_and_only_if >

Typo in Tetris

Absolutely trivial, but none the less ... --- tetris-orig/shapes.c2014-08-03 14:12:09.0 +0100 +++ tetris/shapes.c 2014-08-03 14:12:26.0 +0100 @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ }; /* - * Return true iff the given shape fits in the given position, + * Return true if the given shape fi

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

ker against two otherwise similar versions. there's probably an obvious reason why this is a bad idea. Sam -- Talk does not cook rice - Chinese Proverb

Re: shared libs and ports, maybe a proposal

On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 04:28:27PM +0100, Sam Smith wrote: The CVS revision number is guaranteed atomically increasing and only relevant if it's used as a tie breaker against two otherwise similar versions. there's probably an obvious reason w

Re: urtw needs testing

ks, please test this diff and let > me know if it is ok. I would be happy to test this diff, I have a few different RTL8187B devices I can't get this patch to apply to todays CURRENT, it looks more like this patch was ment to apply against 4.5 Stable, but it still fails to apply cleanly. Does anyone have a patch that applys cleanly to CURRENT? Sam Fourman Jr.