>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:42:26PM +0200, Merlyn wrote:
> > Index: bioctl.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/bioctl/bioctl.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.97
> > diff -u -p -r1.97 bioctl.c
>
Index: bioctl.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/bioctl/bioctl.c,v
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -p -r1.97 bioctl.c
--- bioctl.c10 Jul 2010 02:56:16 - 1.97
+++ bioctl.c12 Sep 2010 21:40:23 -
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int
sending the patch fot bioctl
I'm quite a newbie, so if you find some problem (and you certainly will),
could you please explain it for me?
there is a little change from the previous patch - parameter
has been renamed to -t and expects the number of retries (0 means infinitely).
*** /usr/src/sbin/
tions
--
merlyn
OpenBSD ufo.merlyn.cz 4.8 GENERIC#1 i386
hange it to int.
> 240,253 - not sure if the formatting is correct, but should be
> 812,821 - is there any function that prints error plus returns a
> value? I had to remove errx and err from here and replace it by
> fprintf,return.
>
> Cold you please review the code and write w
tl_conf (as the
command is bioctl)?
Don't be afraid of -F switcher of bioctl, i'm sending the patch for
bioctl in another mail.
Could anyone please take a look and write what's wrong/right, please?
Thanks,
Merlyn
--
merlyn
OpenBSD ufo.merlyn.cz 4.8 GENERIC#1 i386
# comment
# bi
ould be
812,821 - is there any function that prints error plus returns a value?
I had to remove errx and err from here and replace it by
fprintf,return.
Cold you please review the code and write what's wrong?
Thanks,
Merlyn
--
merlyn
OpenBSD ufo.merlyn.cz 4.8 GENERIC#1 i386
[demime
