e IKED_OPT_VERBOSE 0x0001
#define IKED_OPT_NOACTION 0x0002
-#define IKED_OPT_NONATT0x0004
-#define IKED_OPT_NATT 0x0008
-#define IKED_OPT_PASSIVE 0x0010
+#define IKED_OPT_PASSIVE 0x0004
#define
010
> +#define IKED_OPT_PASSIVE 0x0004
This changes internal ABI so maybe clean-build is needed. (should I
avoid this?)
On 2020/04/05 1:58, Wataru Ashihara wrote:
> The data wich
The data wich sc_sock4 has is a little bit complicated:
sc_sock4[0], sc_sock6[0] sc_sock4[1], sc_sock6[1]
no
Hi, thank you for sharing your thoughts, Tobias.
On 2020/04/03 21:31
Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 12:52:24AM +0900, Wataru Ashihara wrote:
> > It would save our time of thinking and reading the source (i.e.
> > eliminate the process of "what if the variab
Found by Yasuhiro Ohishi @iij.
ok?
Index: sbin/iked/control.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/iked/control.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -r1.28 control.c
--- sbin/iked/control.c 22 Mar 2020 15:59:05 - 1.28
+++ sbin/iked/c
Sorry, I forgot to set my name in the email's "From" header.
I'm Wataru Ashihara.
On 2020/04/03 13:11
w...@iij.ad.jp wrote:
> ok?
>
>
> Index: sbin/iked/iked.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sb
It would save our time of thinking and reading the source (i.e.
eliminate the process of "what if the variable 'mobike' was 2 or more?
...aha it's just a bool").
This is still work in progress. I would continue if you maintainers are
positive on this proposal.
Index: sbin/iked/config.c
=
to improve readability.
This is the first time of my commit to OpenBSD, so if I went something
wrong, let me know that.
Index: sbin/iked/config.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/iked/config.c,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -r1.53 con
