Re: patch ftp-proxy, proposal

2010-01-12 Thread Tiery DENYS
wrote: > * Tiery DENYS [2010-01-12 09:47]: > > > A higher value is stupid, because you then end up waiting forever > > > for connections to these anyway.. Are you gonna sit there for > > > 45 seconds before you connect? no, of course not, you're gonna thing >

Re: patch ftp-proxy, proposal

2010-01-12 Thread Tiery DENYS
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:38:32AM +0100, Tiery DENYS wrote: > | On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Bob Beck wrote: > | Yes I prefer waiting here instead of sending any response on ident port. > | (silent fw) > > How can

Re: patch ftp-proxy, proposal

2010-01-12 Thread Tiery DENYS
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Bob Beck wrote: > > ex: > > - There are some public ftp servers missconfigurated who use ident > protocol > > and wait 30 seconds on ident port before sending banner. > > With the default connect_timeout value, it is not possible to connect to > > theses servers w

Re: patch ftp-proxy, proposal

2010-01-11 Thread Tiery DENYS
Does somebody know who currently work on ftp-proxy ? On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Tiery DENYS wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a patch for ftp-proxy. This patch implement an > option concerning specific timeout (connect_timeout). > It add an option for setting

patch ftp-proxy, proposal

2010-01-07 Thread Tiery DENYS
Hi, I would like to propose a patch for ftp-proxy. This patch implement an option concerning specific timeout (connect_timeout). It add an option for setting connect_timeout variable while starting ftp-proxy (this variable is currently set to 30 in code). Setting this variable to another value c