Stefan Sperling stsp.name> writes:
>
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:18:59PM +0200, Thomas Gerlach wrote:
> > however, there's still the following problem:
> > if wol is enabled via /etc/hostname.xl0 (by adding the wol keyword),
> > it's not possible to
On 07/08/2011 02:56 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 09:31:26AM +0000, Thomas Gerlach wrote:
>> Tobias Ulmer tmux.org> writes:
>>
>>> I've lost track which patches need to be applied or not, but once a
>>> complete patch appears, I&#
Tobias Ulmer tmux.org> writes:
>
> I've lost track which patches need to be applied or not, but once a
> complete patch appears, I'm willing to test it on a machine that has
> three different xl's.
>
>
hi tobias,
sorry for any confusion. i think, the recent patches that should work are the
On 06/22/2011 03:15 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:43:27AM +0000, Thomas Gerlach wrote:
>> ...crap! sorry, something went wrong here. :(
>
> I'm not sure what you mean went wrong.
>
> But in an effort to try to wrap this up, can you please try
> Stefan Sperling stsp.name> writes:
> > Index: xl.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/xl.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.101
> > diff -u -p -r1.101 xl.c
> > --- xl.c17 Apr 2011 20:52:43 - 1.101
> > +++ xl.c22 J
Stefan Sperling stsp.name> writes:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:43:27AM +0000, Thomas Gerlach wrote:
> > ...crap! sorry, something went wrong here. :(
>
> I'm not sure what you mean went wrong.
>
> But in an effort to try to wrap this up, can you please tr
...crap! sorry, something went wrong here. :(
Stefan Sperling stsp.name> writes:
>
> Can you please clarify with which code exactly you're seeing this problem?
> What are you running?
> Does it happens with the if_xl_pci.c hunk of my proposed diff, or without it?
> Or does it always happen even in plain -current?
>
ok, of course.
1) every
as for the "pulling toghether", i would suggest something like this (draft,
patches against latest -current files, _without_ stefan's recent patches):
# diff -u xl.c.orig xl.c > xl.c.patch1
--- xl.c.orig Sun Apr 17 22:52:43 2011
+++ xl.cWed Jun 22 11:53:45 2011
@@ -2373,8 +2373,9 @@
For me it works as well. :)
Just two more little flaws:
1) If you configure WOL inside /etc/hostname., then you get the following
error message during booting:
"xl0: command never completed!"
"xl0: transmission error: ff"
and you're not able to login. the problem is:
"xl_init" is called first,
Stefan Sperling stsp.name> writes:
> It would be interesting to know if just the first hunk, which
> re-enables RX, is enough.
>
> I don't have working xl wol hardware, so what I did was compare
> our driver to the FreeBSD driver taking blind guesses as to what
> could be wrong.
>
> So the diff
Stefan Sperling stsp.name> writes:
hi stefan,
oh, sorry, no. i just got back from the german southside festival this evening.
should explain why i missed it... ;)
seems you came to the same conclusion. fine. :) so i will test it then...
Richard Toohey paradise.net.nz> writes:
>
> On 17/06/2011, at 8:40 PM, Thomas Gerlach wrote:
>
> > hello,
> >
> > i just confirmed wol is working with freebsd 8.2 standard installation on
> my
> > box. So it must be the openbsd xl driver, which isn'
hello,
i just confirmed wol is working with freebsd 8.2 standard installation on my
box. So it must be the openbsd xl driver, which isn't working properly.
i will try to fix it starting next week. :)
cheers,
thomas
Stefan Sperling openbsd.org> writes:
>
> This is an attempt to add wol support to xl(4).
>
> Unfortunately, while I have an xl(4) card to test with none of the
> motherboards I have will do WOL with it since they all lack an
> on-board WOL connector :(
>
> So test reports are needed.
> Please
15 matches
Mail list logo
