Hi folks.
Current rdist will timeout with files >2GB, log as finished, but will
not die.
The bug (system/6586) was originally noted by IBM (AIX) in 2006:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IY85396
I have patches for the client rdist and server rdistd.
I have tested i386 and
Hi folks.
Current rdist will timeout with files >2GB, log as finished, but will
not die.
The bug (system/6586) was originally noted by IBM (AIX) in 2006:
https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IY85396
I have patches for the client rdist and server rdistd.
I have tested i386 and
Ran the upgrade from CD.
Want to be sure that packages are OK.
Is "pkg_add -u" sufficient? (It looks like nothing changed.)
Thanks,
Steven
On 3/20/2011 2:07 PM, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
> I want to do local/remote mirror/backup (or should that be local-mirror
> / offsite-backup).
> So a two-part question:
> 1.Even if there is a timeout, shouldn't the
I want to do local/remote mirror/backup (or should that be local-mirror
/ offsite-backup).
So a two-part question:
1. Even if there is a timeout, shouldn't the job/process exit?
**
rdist@thedump: thedump: /mnt/mirror2/
On 2/16/2011 10:50 AM, Joel Sing wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
>> Sorry for cross posting?
>> I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to
>> be no approved method. (4 disks -- I usually like stripe on top of
>
On 2/15/2011 5:52 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> it isn't supported so don't do it. it is in the pipeline to do stacked
> raid sets but it is all talk for now.
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:45:13PM -0500, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
>> Sorry for cross posting?
>> I a
Sorry for cross posting?
I am trying to setup a decent RAID (0+1 or 1+0 or 5) and there SEEMS to
be no approved method. (4 disks -- I usually like stripe on top of
mirrors.)
I believe that I have done my homework.
What are my options?
softraid (bioctl) cannot handle stripe on mirrors:
I can easil
