On 10/04/2021 12:29, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:59:59AM +0100, SW wrote:
>> Good morning,
>> The syspatch man page notes that '-c' "Is suitable for cron(8)", which
>> is true but would benefit from more details.
>>
>&g
Good morning,
The syspatch man page notes that '-c' "Is suitable for cron(8)", which
is true but would benefit from more details.
Hopefully this is in line with the other man pages:
--- syspatch.8 Sun Oct 4 2020
+++ syspatch.8 Sat Apr 10 11:52:20 2021
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
.It Fl c
List availa
> Returning a non-zero exit status is generally a sign of some sort of
> failure. Not applying a patch due to already having the patch applied
> is not really a failure.
Generally agreed, though at the same time, sysupgrade returns non-zero
if there is no upgrade to apply so the same behaviour /
On 06/12/2020 14:32, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 02:19:05PM +0000, SW wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of whether
>> a reboot is likely to be required. As a quick and dirty check, I've just
>
Hi,
I've been looking to have syspatch give me a quick indication of whether
a reboot is likely to be required. As a quick and dirty check, I've just
been treating "Were patches applied?" as the indicator.
The following diff will cause syspatch to exit when applying patches
with status code 0 only
0x2000180 pool
bgpd
23560 12733 12733 75 3 0x2000180 pool
bgpd
12733 1 12733 0 3 0x280 pool
bgpd
12200 29198 29198 85 3 0x2000180 kqread
ospfd
15596
Hi Claudio and tech@,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:54:55 +0700, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
(moved from misc to tech)
On 2009-07-07, Insan Praja SW wrote:
After updating to i386 4.6-current, my multirouting tables is no longer
working. I wonder if this because of the new rodomain thingy.. which
