wrong, or the tarball is wrong. Does anyone think it
worthwhile fixing this?
Regards,
Robert Urban
Hi Eric,
On 02/03/2014 02:00 PM, Robert Urban wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 02/03/2014 10:48 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0100, IMAP List Administration wrote:
>>> [I forgot to send this to the list]
>>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>
On 02/04/2014 01:49 AM, Robert Urban wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 10:12 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
>> I'd run with acpi debug enabled, try to see if we are dropping an event.
> On a 5.4 test system I compiled a new generic MP kernel with "option
> ACPI_DEBUG"
> and boo
On 02/03/2014 10:12 PM, Mike Larkin wrote:
> I'd run with acpi debug enabled, try to see if we are dropping an event.
On a 5.4 test system I compiled a new generic MP kernel with "option ACPI_DEBUG"
and booted it. I set up a serial console.
During boot there is a lot a ACPI debug output. I can ma
this is a (somewhat late) follow-up on the ACPI buttonpress event problem...
This was on misc@, but tech@ seems more appropriate.
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:38:00 Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 7:08 PM, IMAP List Administration
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > some of you may remember a p
Hi Eric,
On 02/03/2014 10:48 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0100, IMAP List Administration wrote:
>> [I forgot to send this to the list]
>>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On 02/01/2014 11:43 AM, Eric Faurot wrote:
>>> The following diff fixes the problems with the example IPs you
