Because you might not wish to deal with people like me posting dmesg's
of absurdly deficient hardware on the lists. Putting minimum values up
means you can cast off everything you don't want to bother trying to
support as 'not worth your time', without anyone else having to
discover that it was
If there will continue to be a minimum disk value then 600MB wouldn't
be nearly enough for swap, maybe 2GB for a whole disk?
--
Patrick Harper
paia...@fastmail.com
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, at 11:29, Zé Loff wrote:
> IMHO, stating minimum disk space requirements might be us
full list of supported hardware.
https://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
Patrick Harper
