I committed the following patch [1] to NetBSD, it's a valid issue for
OpenBSD as well [2]:
Convert EV_SET from macro to static __inline function
LLDB introduced support for kevent(2) and it contains the following
function:
Status MainLoop::RunImpl::Poll() {
in_events.resize(loop.m_read_fds.si
On 01.05.2017 12:28, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Vyukov
>> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 10:43:26 +0200
>>
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Greg Steuck wrote:
>>> I naively tried to build something with -fsanitize=address using llvm-4.0
>>> port available on OpenBSD 6.1-amd64. I was immediatel
On 22.06.2015 01:55, Brian Callahan wrote:
> This is quite obviously the wrong place to put any headers.
>
It's odd, otherwise then the code should be refactored and the following
struct perhaps moved away, together with struct buffer?
/*
* Previously from sysdef.h
* Only used in struct buffer
Caught on NetBSD.
Index: def.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/def.h,v
retrieving revision 1.147
diff -u -r1.147 def.h
--- def.h 3 Jun 2015 23:40:01 - 1.147
+++ def.h 21 Jun 2015 23:43:23 -
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @
Hello Brian,
Thank you for erasing sysdef.h and pushing the task
even further. It will make life easier to deal with
it in a modern environment.
Good work.
Brian Callahan wrote:
> On 03/15/15 19:24, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > Hello, Currently sysdef.h includes C headers for little purpose, as
> > the same headers are already pulled in appropriate .c files. In the
> > result the headers listed in sysdef.h are pulled in twice.
Hello,
Currently sysdef.h includes C headers for little purpose,
as the same headers are already pulled in appropriate .c
files. In the result the headers listed in sysdef.h are
pulled in twice.
I propose to move the remaining content (literally 11
lines-of-code) to def.h or a better place.
I th
Me wrote:
> I'm attaching a patch.
Ooops, wrong file. New attached.
patch-display.c-reallocarray-cleanup
Description: Binary data
Hello,
I'm attaching a patch.
Regards,
patch-display.c-reallocarray-cleanup
Description: Binary data
Ted Unangst wrote:
> ksh (and sh) have a version string embedded in them:
> @(#)PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2
>
> This is clearly a lie. We've added, removed, and fixed bugs and features since
> then. I first noticed the lie in the man page, then saw that it's also
> exported via the environment and o
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 at 5:02 AM
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> To: t...@cvs.openbsd.org
> Subject: Want to help upstream software improve their random?
>
Not my business, but how do you handle cases of rand() & srand()-like
calls from software like awk?
What is and what should be the res
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 at 1:27 AM
> From: "Philip Guenther"
> To: "Kamil Rytarowski"
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: mg(1): Second set of patches
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > I'm attaching two enh
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2014 at 1:09 AM
> From: "Philip Guenther"
> To: "Kamil Rytarowski"
> Cc: "Theo de Raadt" , tech-openbsd
> , "Ted Unangst"
> Subject: Re: mg(1) compatibility patches
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:16
Hello,
I'm attaching two enhancements against mg(1):
0001-Include-limits.h-for-INT_MIN-and-INT_MAX.patch
0002-Comparison-of-array-bp-b_fname-not-equal-to-a-null-p.patch
Regards,>From f4a353e59af01b14455a6302e6309887b70796ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kamil Rytarowski
Date: Sat, 15
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 11:00 PM
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org, n...@gmx.com
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org, t...@tedunangst.com
> Subject: Re: mg(1) compatibility patches
>
> The problem you are trying to define is that we (OpenBSD) are supposed
> to have a sense of r
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 9:59 PM
> From: "Theo de Raadt"
> To: n...@gmx.com, t...@tedunangst.com
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: mg(1) compatibility patches
>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 9:10 PM
> >> From: "Ted U
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 9:10 PM
> From: "Ted Unangst"
> To: "Kamil Rytarowski"
> Cc: tech@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: mg(1) comaptibility patches
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 20:29, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > 0001-Define-strtonum-3-for
Hello,
Thank you for your comments. Please see my comments below.
With regards,
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 8:48 PM
> From: "Philip Guenther"
> To: "Kamil Rytarowski"
> Cc: tech-openbsd
> Subject: Re: mg(1) comaptibility patches
>
> On Fri, N
hings are waiting in the queue.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mg_%28editor%29>From d49301b6559e2b1d432fd347fc826a255f9a3fdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kamil Rytarowski
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:55:03 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] Define strtonum(3) for t
19 matches
Mail list logo
