Anton Maksimenkov wrote:
2010/2/5 Ted Unangst :
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Jeff Ross wrote:
kern.shminfo.shmall=512000
kern.shminfo.shmmax=76800
Oh, when I said it was safe to crank shmmax I didn't know you'd be
setting the bufcache to huge numbers too. ;)
Furthermore
Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:29:13AM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
Jeff Ross wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Bob Beck wrote:
Ooooh. nice one. Obviously ami couldn't get memory mappings and
freaked out.
While not completely necessary, I'd love for you to file
Jeff Ross wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Bob Beck wrote:
Ooooh. nice one. Obviously ami couldn't get memory mappings and
freaked out.
While not completely necessary, I'd love for you to file that whole
thing into sendbug() in a pr so we don't
forget it. but that one I need to
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Bob Beck wrote:
Ooooh. nice one. Obviously ami couldn't get memory mappings and freaked out.
While not completely necessary, I'd love for you to file that whole
thing into sendbug() in a pr so we don't
forget it. but that one I need to pester krw, art, dlg, and maybe
marco
Bob Beck wrote:
My question was motivated by noticing that repeated accesses to a
fairly large file (~ .75 Gb) during a debugging session were slow. It
seemed like the system was re-reading the file from the disk when it
felt like it ought to be sitting in the buffer cache. A little
experimenting
