Hello tech@,
On receiving a packet with unsupported versions rdate(8) says
that "Received NTP version %u, need 4 or lower". This is not quite
true. Supported versions are 1, 2, 3, 4 and not 0.
Index: ntp.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.
This patch makes code more readable and removes empty fprintf() formats.
Index: io.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ed/io.c,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.19 io.c
--- io.c22 Mar 2016 17:58:28 - 1.19
+++ io.c
Ivan Markin:
> Yes, you're absolutely right about purpose of this comment.
> This patch doesn't stop signify(1) from embedding a comment string
> before signature. It just makes it possible to verify signatures even if
> there is no 'untrusted comment: ' string in t
. It just makes it possible to verify signatures even if
there is no 'untrusted comment: ' string in them.
--
Ivan Markin
nt to share.
> You have a problem; when I ask question and you delete text and wave
> your hands in dismissal, it is not I that have a problem, but you.
There is no problem.
--
Ivan Markin
was kind I would not even reply, because you are being a jerk
> only thinking of yourself.
>
> If you cared so much about what signify does and why it is what it
> is, you would have invented it first. But you didn't, did you.
--
Ivan Markin
eful
enough for others one can find a way out without breaking anything.
--
Ivan Markin
Theo de Raadt:
> You might not like it. But the ship sailed. It's too bad you didn't
> invent this stuff.
As I said, it's convenient for me. Maybe also for someone else. This is
all I care about.
--
Ivan Markin
.
Okay, I meant signified files without a comment line.
atm, one can't verify signature if 'untrusted comment: ' line is not there.
Yes, they are _informational_. That's why I think they should be optional.
--
Ivan Markin
1). I don't care. And it's okay if someone does - I've
just put my two cents.
--
Ivan Markin
hink so.
> So why not consider that call it a day, and leave it alone?
Just because.
--
Ivan Markin
At the moment signify(1) requires sigfiles to begin with 'untrusted
comment: '. Sometimes one wants to have no comments and just signature
itself.
Index: signify.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/signify/signify.c,v
retrieving revision
Jason McIntyre:
> Otherwise all interfaces of the same type will be displayed (for
> example, ``fxp'' will display all fxp(4) interfaces).
btw, what is called here 'type' is actually 'name' from above. I.e. it's
driver type, not a generic type (which is 'rdomain').
--
Ivan Markin
'rdomain' a type? We'll get 255 new
interface types then...
For me it's not clear from here how can I invoke particular rdomain.
Maybe it's just me.
--
Ivan Markin
Jason McIntyre:
> i think the "group" description of ifconfig(8) would be the more logical
> place to document this.
Even if it is not a real group? 'rdomain' pseudogroup is only used to
display interfaces. One can't actually consider it as a group.
--
Ivan Markin
Hi tech@,
After some struggling with manual looking for the interfaces attached to
particular rdomain, I added such option to ifconfig(8). So now it
behaves like there is a 'group' for each rdomain.
Index: ifconfig.8
===
RCS file: /
16 matches
Mail list logo
