es. I think the simplifications
of libtsl are also worthwhile.
Regards,
Greg Martin
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 15:05 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Greg Martin wrote:
> >
> > I'd have to say no. There are structures used but not documented and the
> > one line description of some of the functions could be open to
> > interpretation. Sample usage is never
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 15:05 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Greg Martin wrote:
> >
> > I'd have to say no. There are structures used but not documented and the
> > one line description of some of the functions could be open to
> > interpretation. Sample usage is never
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 15:05 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Greg Martin wrote:
> >
> > I'd have to say no. There are structures used but not documented and the
> > one line description of some of the functions could be open to
> > interpretation. Sample usage is never
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 12:25 -0600, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 20 February 2015 at 10:36, Greg Martin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just build libressl on Linux 3.13.0-44-generic. I haven't installed it
> > yet but it was a clean build.
> >
> > I'
tation?
Thanks,
Greg Martin.
