Re: posix_spawn(3)

2012-03-09 Thread Frank Denis
Hi Matthew, Good catch. I'm going to fix that. On Mar 9, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote: > I briefly looked over this code, and the diff looks good to me except > for one subtle FreeBSDism: memory writes done in a vfork(2)'d child > process will not affect the parent process. This

Re: posix_spawn(3)

2012-03-08 Thread Frank Denis
See http://download.pureftpd.org/misc/OpenBSD/patches/posix_spawn.diff -Frank. On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > Hello tech@ > > my last 2 hours I worked on octopress[1]. After fighting with ruby (I'm > NOT a fan) and build a port for devel/ruby-posix-spawn (depend by > octo