Re: Double free in trunk(4)

2015-06-12 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
> On 10 cze 2015, at 17:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > During clone/destroy stress tests on pseudo-interfaces I found a double > free easily reproducible with dhclient(8) running on top of a trunk(4). > > The problem comes from trunk_ether_delmulti() which is almost identical > to carp's version

Re: em(4) support for another Tolopai based board

2015-05-19 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Dariusz Swiderski wrote: > Hi, > > Attached patch implements support for yet another Tolopai (EP80579) > based soho router. As some of you might remeber I wrote the original > support for this platform during h2k9. > > In this case, the board is nam

em(4) support for another Tolopai based board

2015-05-16 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
Hi, Attached patch implements support for yet another Tolopai (EP80579) based soho router. As some of you might remeber I wrote the original support for this platform during h2k9. In this case, the board is named Teak 3020, and not only it does not follow intel recomedation on GCU usage, but also

em(4) 82575 testers needed

2010-02-26 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
hi, looking for anyone who can test attached diff on any 82575 h/w. this patch includes fixes sent by Atte Peltomaki, that fixed his quadport card. my main concern is that it removes static recognition of attached PHY and relies on em_detect_gig_phy(). since such changes have already caused a

Re: more of em(4) support for iCH10 chip

2009-06-24 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
On Jun 24, 2009, at 10:06 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 04:28:10PM +0200, Dariusz Swiderski wrote: On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Dariusz Swiderski wrote: On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Brad wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -, sfi...@kefir.sfires.net wrote: hi

Re: more of em(4) support for iCH10 chip

2009-06-24 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Brad wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -, sfi...@kefir.sfires.net wrote: hi, following diff brings support for ICH10 R BM LF chip as well, basic tests done by matthew at dempsky org (thanks). no changes to the code except for binging in new defines

Re: more of em(4) support for iCH10 chip

2009-06-24 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Dariusz Swiderski wrote: > On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Brad wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -, sfi...@kefir.sfires.net wrote: > > > hi, > > > > > > following diff brings support for ICH10 R BM LF chip as wel

Re: more of em(4) support for iCH10 chip

2009-06-23 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
On Jun 24, 2009, at 2:30 AM, Brad wrote: On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:06:34PM -, sfi...@kefir.sfires.net wrote: hi, following diff brings support for ICH10 R BM LF chip as well, basic tests done by matthew at dempsky org (thanks). no changes to the code except for binging in new defines

Re: em(4) support for i82574L chip, repost

2009-06-22 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, sfi...@kefir.sfires.net wrote: hi, sorry for my last post, i will not use Mail again :) hi, this diff incudes Mark Kettenis remarks in respect to KNF no functional change Index: if_em.c === RCS file: /cvs/sr

em(4) support for i82574L chip

2009-06-17 Thread Dariusz Swiderski
hi, this diff adds support for i82674L gigabit controller, added new phy type (BME1000) which is in most aspects compatible with M88. i've been running this diff on one machine for last weekend and seems to work fine. regards sfires Index: if_em.c ==