Do you want me to send a new patch with all the corrections included
or it is not necessary any more?
śr., 8 sty 2020 o 04:35 Todd C. Miller napisał(a):
>
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2020 14:29:11 +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
> > The non-pro product supposedly is 126f:2262 going by
> > https://bugzilla.ke
Hi,
I've bought a new SSD drive by ADATA recently and its vendor and product
IDs are missing in pcidevs. Here is a patch to add it to the pcidevs.
Vendor and product info is taken from:
https://devicehunt.com/view/type/pci/vendor/1CC1/device/8201
Index: pcidevs
===
Wouldn't it lead to undefined behavior?
According to the standard: "... The value of the result of an integer
arithmetic or conversion function cannot be represented (7.8.2.1, 7.8.2.2,
7.8.2.3, 7.8.2.4, 7.22.6.1, 7.22.6.2, 7.22.1) ..."
This dump case is not compiled with -fwrapv flag, so I guess it