Re: smtpd 5.9.1 vs 6.0 & possible corner case / regression

2016-08-22 Thread Chris Turner
On 08/20/16 10:03, Anthony La Porte wrote: On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, Eric Faurot wrote: Can you guys try this diff? With this hostname and message-id are back. Thanks! +1 - cheers. - C

smtpd 5.9.1 vs 6.0 & possible corner case / regression

2016-08-09 Thread Chris Turner
Hello - Just installed a 6.0 snapshot (from yesterday, though then rebuilt), and noticed what seemed to be a possible regression (or otherwise PEBCAK) in smtpd for my specific dumb-host configuration - Basically, configuration is as follows: - configuration: - Host is test VM behind private

Re: [patch] was: Re: login(3) routines data integrity patch

2015-11-13 Thread Chris Turner
On 11/12/15 14:10, Ted Unangst wrote: Chris Turner wrote: >>> The attached patch calls fsync(2) on related FD's in the login(3) routines, which corrected the problem on my test machine, and imho might be a good idea in general. AFAIK it should not be necessary to call fsync(

[patch] was: Re: login(3) routines data integrity patch

2015-11-12 Thread Chris Turner
Wondering if anyone had a chance to take a look at these - Subject line tagged accordingly :D Cheers, - Chris On 10/30/15 11:44, Chris Turner wrote: Hello - I was testing some login data collection scripts (on a VM) and discovered that in certain cases, it was possible for a login record

login(3) routines data integrity patch

2015-10-30 Thread Chris Turner
Hello - I was testing some login data collection scripts (on a VM) and discovered that in certain cases, it was possible for a login record to not be fully commited to disk prior to system shutdown, resulting in the last(1) entry for the login not being visible. (was doing e.g. ssh root@testbox