Subject: Re: pf queue definition: bandwidth resolution problem
To: "Carl Mascott"
Cc: "Theo Buehler" , tech@openbsd.org
Date: Monday, May 15, 2017, 3:28 PM
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 21:08 +, Carl
Mascott wrote:
> OK, I was indeed missing
something. Thanks, Th
andwidth resolution problem
To: tech@openbsd.org
Date: Sunday, May 14, 2017, 4:35 PM
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:29:18PM +0000, Carl
Mascott wrote:
> It looks to me like you
are rounding on each iteration of the for-loop:
>
> + for (i = 0;
rate > && i <= 3; i++) {
4/17, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Subject: Re: pf queue definition: bandwidth resolution problem
To: "Carl Mascott"
Cc: tech@openbsd.org, t...@openbsd.org
Date: Sunday, May 14, 2017, 4:05 PM
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 19:48 +, Carl
Mascott wrote:
> I have a suggestion RE
your pftop
queue definition: bandwidth resolution problem
To: "Carl Mascott"
Cc: tech@openbsd.org, t...@openbsd.org
Date: Saturday, May 13, 2017, 8:02 PM
Good call. This one is a bit more complicated
since we have 5 positions
to display and the
last one is sort of reserved for the unit spe
inary?
Any problem with dropping the new pfctl
binary into my 6.1-stable (i386) system?
P.S. I'm new to OpenBSD.
--------
On Sat, 5/13/17, Carl Mascott
wrote:
Subject: Re: pf queue definition:
bandwidth resolution problem
To: "Mike Belop
y you have already tested it.
In that case, I guess it's OK to commit it (or however the process works..).
Gee, this was easy. Thanks!
On Sat, 5/13/17, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
Subject: Re: pf queue definition: bandwidth resolution problem
To
