On 16-03-13 11:11 PM, Michael McConville wrote:
It seems that chown(1) will write to a file even if it already has the
desired ownership. The below patch causes it to skip the write when
there would be no change. The best I could tell, the fts_read(3) and
fchownat(3) logic agree on whether to fo
On 2016-02-21 04:16 PM, Gregor Best wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:41:06PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
It makes no sense to renumber the FT232_1 entry. That is just creating
churn.
As to the 0x entry, I'm wondering whether it should be named something
like the following, as a historical
till has room for
improvement... I haven't run OpenBSD on it for any significant amount of
time since the ~recent changes to improve Thinkpad power usage.
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
about that one).
Client-server protocols are generally written to retry on, or otherwise
be resilient to, failure; signalling shutdown when I have to kick the
server in the head for some reason (which, yes, even happens with
OpenBSD :-)) would be a bad thing for some to many clients.
--
ults in
payloads up to 10x larger and that run up to 10x slower, or to probe for
advanced features and exit cleanly and safely if they're absent.
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
+1 (204) 291-7950 - cell
+1 (204) 489-6515 - fax
ri Feb 13 21:40:32 2015
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
.Nd control the Network Time Protocol daemon
.Sh SYNOPSIS
.Nm ntpctl
-.Op Fl s Cm all | peers | Sensors | status
+.Fl s
+.Op Cm all | peers | Sensors | status
.Sh DESCRIPTION
The
.Nm
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
+1 (204) 291-7950 - cell
+1 (204) 489-6515 - fax
rks or not
as-is; any opinions on what would be the canonical approach to swapping
IPs between interfaces on a live system? Just do it by hand? Write
your own script? Use netstart? Or just reboot?
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
For the rest of us who prefer to use software instead of demanding changes,
this simply means using OpenBSD in a strictly-isolated environment becomes a
bit more difficult.
I'm still not willing to use Linux LiveCDs in certain environments for the most
part, and I'll just get used to having the
I would know of its existence, but likely not install it. As I said, I have
workarounds. I remember how bad the code was years ago, so I agree with the
idea in general, but it will be a pain in the butt for me every once in a while
:-(.
-Adam
On July 11, 2014 4:03:29 AM CDT, Theo de Raadt wr
Pretty standard thing in several companies I do work for is to have an intranet
page with http://, ssh://, telnet:// and finger:// (amazingly) links to various
devices on the network. Having to read the source and escape to a shell would
be somewhat worse than what I get on a base install today
As a user, not a developer...
I still use finger, gopher, and news URLs at least once a year each. As a
user, I disagree with turning support for those schemes off completely.
Finger and news I can use another tool, and I'd concede that no-one really
*needs* a news reader in base. (I still find
and not wasting ?
Now waiting incoming cluebats :-(
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
I do use it occasionally, and I don't run -current so I wouldn't have noticed
any breakage yet.
I don't rely on it, however, it's a convenience feature that I very
occasionally use, and only manually when I do.
I can live without it if it dies; it was never a fully-featured implementation
IMHO a
On 2014-06-12 11:32, Alexander Hall wrote:
> On June 11, 2014
6:18:19 AM CEST, Lawrence Teo wrote:
>
>> This diff
allows ftp(1) to change the User-Agent for HTTP(S) URL requests via the
FTPUSERAGENT environment variable (personally I prefer HTTPUSERAGENT but
FTPUSERAGENT is what's used by ft
's not a glowing
endorsement...)
[*] except for one software management console that doesn't support
IPv6 at all. My printers, my WiFi APs, even my CEPH cluster are all
IPv6-native. The worst network-stack stupidity I've seen so far was on
the WiFi AP, and it only affected IPv4.
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
On April 28, 2014 5:43:34 PM CDT, Kenneth Westerback
wrote:
>On 28 April 2014 18:05, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> Tech,
>>
>> Now that my AI_ADDRCONFIG diff is in, it's time to reveal my evil
>master plan:
>> make getaddrinfo() return IPv6 results first by default.
>
>Why is the burden on everyone
r?) Ditto for my DNS servers, my mail
server, my proxy server, etc.
So, I would like to know what application Giancarlo has where he actually
notices the lack of multiple cores.
-Adam
On April 17, 2014 12:23:44 PM CDT, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:22:44PM -0500, Adam T
Given the single-threaded nature of much of the kernel, what applications do
you run where multiple CPUs makes much of a difference to OpenBSD?
Also, switching from IDE to any of the supported SCSI, SAS or SATA disk types
also produces a noticeable improvement. I'm not sure if those are availab
GNU dd definitely has it (along with the wholly-expected proliferation of other
useless units). It's definitely not called for by POSIX. IIRC, Solaris
supports some units but not others. HPUX doesn't support any units at all.
Don't know what other BSDs or AIX support.
-Adam
On March 23, 201
with either of these and require a port of
the modified apache from base.
smokeping.
I still can't figure out how to get the CGI part to work under
nginx/slowcgi.
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
On 13-11-05 10:12 AM, Adam Thompson wrote:
I can do doc changes, but I think you really, *really* don't want me
writing much C code... I can perhaps do some of the initial, trivial,
legwork, at best. Now, if bgpd(8) were written in Bourne/Korn shell,
I'd be the guy to do this!
I
On 13-11-04 05:09 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:36:39AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
The change I think we're both asking for is that in
.../usr/sbin/bgpd/kroute.c, on line 505 (5.4-RELEASE), where we see
"kr->r.priority = RTP_BGP;", we need a way to over
with
"route change", but doing so is a very, very ugly idea (worse in Loïc's
case than mine, I think). You'd have to have a script/daemon of your
own watching the output from "route monitor" and executing "route
change" every time a route gets inserted with
ow but I don't want to completely remove the
interface configuration.
I must be missing something here...
(I don't have any other multihomed hosts to test this on at the moment.
5.4-RELEASE installed from CD.)
Help!?
--
-Adam Thompson
athom...@athompso.net
24 matches
Mail list logo
