On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:27:24AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > OK for your diff. Please put it in and I'll rebase on top.
> >
> > done
>
> Thanks. Here is a rebased version. Re-tested with the same results.
not all the incl
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 02:10:47AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Crystal Kolipe wrote in
> :
> |On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:36:48AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> |> Non-7-bit clean headers need RFC 2047 (and/or RFC 2231) encoding.
> |
> |The use of MIME encoded words to encode header cont
Currently when a umb device gets a new IPv4 address, it just adds it to
the interface and tries to set the default route through it. If there's
a different previous address, it stays there, and any routes using it also
remain in place, so umb can't set the new default route. You see something
lik
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 05:26:14PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 03:41:39PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 03:47:31PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2
Crystal Kolipe wrote in
:
|On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:36:48AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> Non-7-bit clean headers need RFC 2047 (and/or RFC 2231) encoding.
|
|The use of MIME encoded words to encode header content is no longer
|considered best practice. See, for example RFC 6532.
Yes
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:36:48AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> Non-7-bit clean headers need RFC 2047 (and/or RFC 2231) encoding.
The use of MIME encoded words to encode header content is no longer
considered best practice. See, for example RFC 6532.
But as Omar said, let's get the basics of
Hello Omar.
Omar Polo wrote in
<2HJQ4VX5L4J1P.3G4A39B0RA6T7@venera>:
...
|>MUAs always set appropriate MIME headers. RFC 2046 section 4.1.2
|>paragraph 8 also "strongly" recommends the explicit inclusion of a
|>"charset" parameter even for us-ascii.
So that really went me lookin
The `_POSIX_TIMERS` macro is defined to -1, indicating no support for
the POSIX timers option. This option indicates support for the
`clock_getres`, `clock_gettime`, `clock_settime`, `nanosleep`, and
`timer_*` functions. While the `timer_*` functions do not appear to be
supported by OpenBSD, the ub
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 02:05:52PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Anyway, here is an eephy(4) diff to enable/disable delays on the 88E1512.
That diff wasn't quite right. The register offset should be 0x21,
and Linux configures delays every time after link auto-negotiation.
I am still unsure if t
Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:25:44AM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > > > Thanks, I actually have one of these myself. So I'm going to
> > > > investigate (and probably drop one of the diffs).
> > >
> > > I don't see any problems on my machine. Firmware loads and WiFi
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 10:27:24 +0200
> From: Stefan Sperling
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > OK for your diff. Please put it in and I'll rebase on top.
> >
> > done
>
> Thanks. Here is a rebased version. Re-tested with the same results.
ok kettenis@
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:27:24AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > OK for your diff. Please put it in and I'll rebase on top.
> >
> > done
>
> Thanks. Here is a rebased version. Re-tested with the same results.
Turns out I made
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 06:25:44AM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > > Thanks, I actually have one of these myself. So I'm going to
> > > investigate (and probably drop one of the diffs).
> >
> > I don't see any problems on my machine. Firmware loads and WiFi works
> > just fine on my MacBookPr
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 09:06:59PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > OK for your diff. Please put it in and I'll rebase on top.
>
> done
Thanks. Here is a rebased version. Re-tested with the same results.
diff refs/heads/master refs/heads/dwqe
commit - 8af2f04850cda85ea291bfaddc0e4d58c40f2935
comm
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:41:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> The firmware for the BCM4388 has yet another version of the "escan"
> command. But we can treat it the same as v2 since it just added a new
> parameter in place of some padding. We just set that new parameter to
> zero, which doesn'
More changes:
- I changed my overpopulated Message-ID for the function used by
smtpd(8) (generate_uid()). Now the Message-ID generated by mail(1)
is identical to the one generated by smtpd(8).
- Added a conditional to skip adding the Message-ID if the machine
doesn't have hostname ye
16 matches
Mail list logo