On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:18:40PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:42:50PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Turns out the exec in cmd_exec.c has absolutely zero reason to be
> > different from what engine does.
> >
> > This small patch moves a bit of code around, so that all exec
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:42:50PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Turns out the exec in cmd_exec.c has absolutely zero reason to be
> different from what engine does.
>
> This small patch moves a bit of code around, so that all execv() consumers
> benefit from the same optimisation (namely, no extra s
Turns out the exec in cmd_exec.c has absolutely zero reason to be
different from what engine does.
This small patch moves a bit of code around, so that all execv() consumers
benefit from the same optimisation (namely, no extra shell when not needed).
The only visible change should be that now, VA
