Re: recv.2: Remove an extra space in the formatted output

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 06:44:34PM -0400, Josiah Frentsos wrote: > Index: lib/libc/sys/recv.2 > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/recv.2,v > retrieving revision 1.50 > diff -u -p -r1.50 recv.2 > --- lib/libc/sys/recv.2 9 Sep

Re: cksum.1: use imperative tense

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 08:29:23PM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 7:02???PM Klemens Nanni wrote: > > > > Consistent with other options and our manuals in general. > > > > Index: cksum.1 > > === > > RCS file

Re: cksum.1: use imperative tense

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 7:02 PM Klemens Nanni wrote: > > Consistent with other options and our manuals in general. > > Index: cksum.1 > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/md5/cksum.1,v > retrieving revision 1.40 > diff -u -p -r1.40 cksum.1

Re: bioctl: do not confirm new passphrases on stdin

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 03:44:46PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:37:36AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > Creating new volumes prompts > > Passphrase: > > Re-type passphrase: > > which is sane for interative usage, but -s (which omits prompts) to read > > from stdi

link mbufs/inpcbs to pf_states, not pf_state_keys

there are links between the pcb/socket layer and pf as an optimisation, and links on mbufs between both sides of a forwarded connection. these links let pf skip an rb tree lookup for outgoing packets. right now these links are between pf_state_key structs, which are the things that contain the act

cksum.1: use imperative tense

Consistent with other options and our manuals in general. Index: cksum.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/md5/cksum.1,v retrieving revision 1.40 diff -u -p -r1.40 cksum.1 --- cksum.1 4 Aug 2022 06:20:24 - 1.40 +++ cksum.1

recv.2: Remove an extra space in the formatted output

Index: lib/libc/sys/recv.2 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/sys/recv.2,v retrieving revision 1.50 diff -u -p -r1.50 recv.2 --- lib/libc/sys/recv.2 9 Sep 2022 16:48:25 - 1.50 +++ lib/libc/sys/recv.2 16 Aug 2023 22:08:42 - @

Re: [PATCH] Implement ext2 incompat feature 64-bit

On 2023/08/15 18:16, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: > Did I do something wrong and should send it to another list, CC someone or > did I do something stupid? 64-bit incompat feature is enabled on new ext4's > by default, at least on Ubuntu It's the right list. However as ext2fs support is no