On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 12:03:41AM +0200, Ulf Brosziewski wrote:
> This version of the diff adds a wsconsctl field, named "mouse.tp.
> mtbuttons", and an update to the wsmouse.4 page. Apart from that, it
> contains only stylistic changes.
>
> The new wsconsctl field is just a boolean, I don't thi
Hello!
I've been enjoying the resurrection of no-tab-mode in mg(1).
It is simple to enable by default:
set-default-mode notab
The manual page says that "built in modes include fill, indent and
overwrite". This patch makes the list more complete by adding notab,
and adds "can be set globally
This version of the diff adds a wsconsctl field, named "mouse.tp.
mtbuttons", and an update to the wsmouse.4 page. Apart from that, it
contains only stylistic changes.
The new wsconsctl field is just a boolean, I don't think that it would
make sense to include the distance filter in the configura
> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 17:52:44 +0200
> From: Alexander Bluhm
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:55:23PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:09:32 +
> > > From: Klemens Nanni
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > > M_TEMP s
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:55:23PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:09:32 +
> > From: Klemens Nanni
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > > M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations.
> >
> > After claudio
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 03:27:55PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 08:58:47PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:52:20PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > count() is strange since it only works on maps (at least from what I
> > > figured out). I need to
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 08:58:47PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:52:20PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > count() is strange since it only works on maps (at least from what I
> > figured out). I need to double check how min() and max() work. Since the
> > usage also seems
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:55:15AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:55:04AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the following diff adds the Intel Wi-Fi 6 0x51f1 device, found in a
> > new Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 11.
> >
> > iwx0 at pci0 dev 20 function 3 "Intel Wi-
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:09:32AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations.
>
> After claudio pointed out the wrong type, I thought of the same name,
> no other malloc(9) ty
> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:09:32 +
> From: Klemens Nanni
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations.
>
> After claudio pointed out the wrong type, I thought of the same name,
> no other malloc(9)
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:09:32AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations.
>
> After claudio pointed out the wrong type, I thought of the same name,
> no other malloc(9) ty
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations.
After claudio pointed out the wrong type, I thought of the same name,
no other malloc(9) type fits.
FWIW OK kn, but please wait for other to chime in.
>
> Don't
M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations.
Don't forget to recompile systat(1) and vmstat(8) with new sys/malloc.h.
Index: sys/net/if.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if.c,v
retrieving revision 1.700
diff -u -p
On 2023/06/27 10:55, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I have this (AP is mikrotik hapax2
> 0x0001, country 'GB ', channel 36 limit 23dB, channel 40 limit
> 23dB, channel 44 limit 23dB, channel 48 limit 23dB, channel 52 limit
> 23dB, channel 56 limit 23dB, channel 60 limit 23dB, channel 64 limit
> 23d
Sorry this diff is a monster but it kind of turned into a all or nothing
situation.
For a long time bgpd used a static 4k buffer plus a len argument to build
updates. The result was ok but was also very fragile.
With the new ibuf API all of this can be rewritten and the result is IMO
already a lot
On 2023/06/27 10:55, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> This works fine with my 11ac setup and performance seems OK (around
> 200Mbps - what can I expect on OpenBSD these days?). I don't know if
> the device supports UHB channels.
That seems a little on the low side but in the right ballpark,
I have this (AP
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:55:04AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the following diff adds the Intel Wi-Fi 6 0x51f1 device, found in a
> new Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 11.
>
> iwx0 at pci0 dev 20 function 3 "Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX211" rev 0x01, msix
> iwx0: hw rev 0x370, fw 77.f92b5fed.0, pnvm e4a4953
Hi,
the following diff adds the Intel Wi-Fi 6 0x51f1 device, found in a
new Thinkpad X1 Carbon Gen 11.
iwx0 at pci0 dev 20 function 3 "Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX211" rev 0x01, msix
iwx0: hw rev 0x370, fw 77.f92b5fed.0, pnvm e4a49534, address ...
I looked at the Linux code for the values for 0x51f1 and 0x7
18 matches
Mail list logo
