16.02.2023 18:29, Mikhail пишет:
> /etc/X11/xenodm/Xsession file has a check for x bit
>
> startup=$HOME/.xsession
> [...]
> if [ -s "$startup" ]; then
> if [ -x "$startup" ]; then
> "$startup"
> else
> /bin/sh "$startup"
> fi
> [...]
This w
/etc/X11/xenodm/Xsession file has a check for x bit
startup=$HOME/.xsession
[...]
if [ -s "$startup" ]; then
if [ -x "$startup" ]; then
"$startup"
else
/bin/sh "$startup"
fi
[...]
diff /var/git/xenocara
commit - 1322100d794a22f2ed024540585b4
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:30:34AM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote:
> llvm-strip is somehow ignoring the alignment requirements of the segments.
> If you look at the "readelf -l" output instead:
>
> Good:
> Program Headers:
> Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align
>
This is the mbuf(9) allocation and broadcast transmission for PF_ROUTE
sockets, netlock is not required here. Make sense for systems with many
short time living pseudo interfaces like tun(4) and pppx(4).
The corresponding IFAN_ARRIVAL announce could be also done without
netlock held, but I like t
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:19:07PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
>
> Sorry for big non obvious diff. I need this refactoring to keep required
> lock order between solock() and the standalone sblock().
>
The standalone sblock() could be non obvious for this moment. I want to
to this mostly beca
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 08:08:42PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 05:03:30PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > It makes sense to push solock() down to sosetopt() too. For a half cases
> > (*pr_ctloutput)() is just null op, so there is no reason to call it.
> > Also, a lot
