Oopsie.
OK florian
On 2023-02-14 17:30 -05, Josiah Frentsos wrote:
> Index: dhcpleased/dhcpleased.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/dhcpleased/dhcpleased.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.28
> diff -u -p -r1.28 dhcpleased.c
> --- dhcplea
With the perl update, we get a new version of unicode available to
update this file as well. This was just running the script with the new
perl version.
OK?
Index: share/locale/ctype/en_US.UTF-8.src
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/loca
patrick mentioned a machine with:
cpu0: Intel Atom(R) x6425RE Processor @ 1.90GHz, 1895.90 MHz, 06-96-01
isn't matched by fw_update
that is different to what we've seen in the past, such as
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1.60
GHz, 06-0d-06
cpu0: Intel(R)
Hello,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 01:23:16AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 08:39:39AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > this bug has been found and reported by Hrvoje@ [1].
> > I took my chance and asked Hrvoje to test a small diff [2].
> > I would like to ask for OK to
Index: dhcpleased/dhcpleased.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/dhcpleased/dhcpleased.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -p -r1.28 dhcpleased.c
--- dhcpleased/dhcpleased.c 11 Dec 2022 10:47:37 - 1.28
+++ dhcpleased/dhcpleased
Hi Theo,
Thanks for the feedback, good catch on 'len'! Following your suggestions
- how about the below?
Kind regards,
Job
Index: main.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/rsync/main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -p -r1.65 main.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 01:05:36PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> bgpd does not really synchronize the start of sessions with
> the config reload of the RDE. This is fine but there is one gotcha.
> When loading big configs including RTR tables the delay between the SE
> finishing the config reload (
bgpd does not really synchronize the start of sessions with
the config reload of the RDE. This is fine but there is one gotcha.
When loading big configs including RTR tables the delay between the SE
finishing the config reload (RECONF_DONE) and the RDE finally getting
RECONF_DONE is so long that on
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:38:20AM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Currently route monitor only accepts -inet and -inet6 as address family
> but -mpls is also a valid option. It is the 3 routing tables we support.
>
> OK?
ok
> --
> :wq Claudio
>
> Index: route.c
> ===
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 09:16:58PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> I noticed there is an issue in openrsync when a port is specified in the
> rsync:// URL, the port number ends up becoming part of the path:
>
> $ openrsync -r rsync://rsync.roa.tohunet.com:3873/repo/ /tmp/r
> rsync: [sender] c
Hi
Going back a few versions, it seems this hr was used to separate the
past from the future. So put it back in the right place. While here
also correct the year for future events, or should that be replaced by
"None currently scheduled"?
Best,
Martin
diff --git a/events.html b/events.html
in
Currently route monitor only accepts -inet and -inet6 as address family
but -mpls is also a valid option. It is the 3 routing tables we support.
OK?
--
:wq Claudio
Index: route.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/route/route.c,v
retrievin
12 matches
Mail list logo