On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 1:47 AM Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> Hi,
> This diff adds supports for the following to uhidpp:
>
> 1. Bolt receivers, they use a different set of registers for querying
>paired devices.
>
> 2. The Unified Battery feature, this is a more competent feature
>function use
Yes, that is understandable and suggests "no need to panic".
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:09:58 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
>
> > But "Resource temporarily unavailable" has absolutely no meaning to
> > anyone who will try to do this by hand, it is better for the message
> > to interpret the situati
On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:09:58 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" wrote:
> But "Resource temporarily unavailable" has absolutely no meaning to
> anyone who will try to do this by hand, it is better for the message
> to interpret the situation so that someone can understand.
Agreed, it would be friendlier to fo
Hello,
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 08:33:28PM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> I just need to say that with all pf, pfsync and with pf_purge diffs
> after hackaton + this diff on tech@
> https://www.mail-archive.com/tech@openbsd.org/msg72582.html
> my production firewall seems stable and it wasn't wit
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 03:23:03PM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 07:12:12PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:44:05AM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> > > I think this is the complete diff, with the man page bits mostly from
> > > Martijn. N
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 07:12:12PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:44:05AM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> > I think this is the complete diff, with the man page bits mostly from
> > Martijn. Now that the ifconfig -M bits are in, this should be easier
> > to test. I w
Hi all,
sashan@ and dlg@ I'm sorry if your eyes bleeds from pfsync panics. I
just wanted to send panic log here after pf_purge backout.
I'm testing pfsync with NET_TASKQ=6 because I have 6 core boxes and that
way panics are faster to trigger.
In this test I sure that pf is hitting state limit quit
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 10:44:05AM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> I think this is the complete diff, with the man page bits mostly from
> Martijn. Now that the ifconfig -M bits are in, this should be easier
> to test. I was able to test the installer bits, and they worked for me.
This reads
I think this is the complete diff, with the man page bits mostly from
Martijn. Now that the ifconfig -M bits are in, this should be easier
to test. I was able to test the installer bits, and they worked for me.
Index: etc/netstart
But "Resource temporarily unavailable" has absolutely no meaning to
anyone who will try to do this by hand, it is better for the message
to interpret the situation so that someone can understand.
I think your proposal makes it worse.
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> To debug things, I started slaacd manu
To debug things, I started slaacd manually from single-user:
boot> b /bsd -s
# slaacd -dv
slaacd: already running
We added the lock and this message to prevent multiple instances in the
installer, where this is indeed the only error case that can happen.
But hitting it ou
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 02:39:48PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 07:46:08AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This diff adds supports for the following to uhidpp:
> >
> > 1. Bolt receivers, they use a different set of registers for querying
> >paired devices.
>
On Sat, Nov 26, 2022 at 07:46:08AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> Hi,
> This diff adds supports for the following to uhidpp:
>
> 1. Bolt receivers, they use a different set of registers for querying
>paired devices.
>
> 2. The Unified Battery feature, this is a more competent feature
>fu
13 matches
Mail list logo
