Re: remove twm(1) from xenocara ?

2022-07-17 Thread Alessandro De Laurenzis
This is just the perspective of a user (even less: my _personal_ perspective). Removing twm would be a mistake in my opinion. It is still pretty functional and, when correctly configured, useful for server maintenance. And having it available in stock X11 is a definitely a plus. Cheers On July

libagentx: enable objects on dynamic index enabling

2022-07-17 Thread Martijn van Duren
Diff below is needed for migrating snmpd's mib.c to a libagentx based environment. Specifically the OPENBSD-MEM-MIB:memIfTable, which relies on IF-MIB:ifIndex. The issue bubbles forth from the following behaviour: In libagentx both an object and an index are enabled (started) based when their resp

remove twm(1) from xenocara ?

2022-07-17 Thread Matthieu Herrb
Hi, twm(1) is the original X11R5 window manager. It has not been update to support any of the extended window manager hints and still only knows how to handle the legacy bitmapped fonts rendered by the X server. In ports we have x11/ctwm which, for people looking at legacy stuff, is superior ihmo