On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:37:00PM -0700, David Rinehart wrote:
> apm(4): apm - Alliance ProMotion video driver
This reference is about the power management apm kernel driver which
exists only on amd64, arm64, i386, loongson, and macppc, e.g.:
https://man.openbsd.org/man4/amd64/apm.4
apm(4): apm - Alliance ProMotion video driver
On 6/18/22 23:34, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 10:14:18PM -0700, David Rinehart wrote:
>> apm(4) seems unrelated to apmd(8)
> What makes you think so?
>
> DESCRIPTION
> apmd monitors the advanced power management device, apm(4),
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 10:14:18PM -0700, David Rinehart wrote:
> apm(4) seems unrelated to apmd(8)
What makes you think so?
DESCRIPTION
apmd monitors the advanced power management device, apm(4), acting on
signaled events and upon user requests as sent by the apm(8) program.
apm(4) seems unrelated to apmd(8)
Index: usr.sbin/apmd/apmd.8
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/apmd/apmd.8,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -p -u -p -r1.55 apmd.8
--- usr.sbin/apmd/apmd.8 28 May 2022 16:07:54 - 1.55
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 11:17:43PM +, S M wrote:
> Sending a separate patch as this is unrelated to my previous e-mail.
>
fixed, thanks.
i note that the same text is present in regress/usr.bin/diff/t11.1 and
t11.2. i know that will not matter, but noting here in case someone
thinks that shou
Sending a separate patch as this is unrelated to my previous e-mail.
diff --git bin/ed/ed.1 bin/ed/ed.1
index f5fc5be2e76..3ed865e0a05 100644
--- bin/ed/ed.1
+++ bin/ed/ed.1
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ is a positive number, causes only the
match to be replaced.
It is an error if no substitutions are pe
The test suite of the ed utility has five tests that fail because they
test for restrictions that aren't actually enforced by the program. The
README says that it's because POSIX requires that only a single address
be specified for the commands 'a', '=', 'i', 'k' and 'r'. However, I've
looked into
