On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:18:00PM +0200, Moritz Buhl wrote:
> Dear tech@,
>
> The attached diff should handle checksum offloading for igc(4)
> for IPv4, TCP, and UDP.
>
> I tested with "Intel I225-LM" rev 0x03,
> kevlo@ tested this with "Intel I225-V" rev 0x03
>
> OK?
The diff doesn't look rig
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> This introduces max-communities, max-ext-communities and
> max-large-communities for filters which allows to limit the number of
> communities in a path.
>
> The 3 filters can all be used together and also with other match filters
>
This introduces max-communities, max-ext-communities and
max-large-communities for filters which allows to limit the number of
communities in a path.
The 3 filters can all be used together and also with other match filters
including community X:Y.
--
:wq Claudio
Index: bgpd.conf.5
==
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:27:46PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 03:50:38PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > Noticed this morning working on something else. The non-transitive
> > > extended community support
Long long ago it was considered chique to use AS_DOT to write 4-byte AS
numbers. Like 3.10 instead of 196618. tcpdump also followed this trend but
then the world switched to AS_PLAIN so did bgpd. It is time for tcpdump
to follow.
Now the ugly bit about the ASPATH attribute is that it is not known
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 03:50:38PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > Noticed this morning working on something else. The non-transitive
> > extended community support is fairly messed up. In my case (set
> > ext-community rt 1:1) it caus
Dear tech@,
The attached diff should handle checksum offloading for igc(4)
for IPv4, TCP, and UDP.
I tested with "Intel I225-LM" rev 0x03,
kevlo@ tested this with "Intel I225-V" rev 0x03
OK?
Index: /sys/dev/pci/if_igc.c
===
RCS fil
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 08:12:25PM +, Job Snijders wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I based this off reading https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9234
>
> This code is untested! I haven't had a chance yet to tcpdump a RFC 9234
> capable BGP speaker. There might be some out there, according to
> https
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Noticed this morning working on something else. The non-transitive
> extended community support is fairly messed up. In my case (set
> ext-community rt 1:1) it causes the community to be skipped.
>
> First of all the check in non_tra
Noticed this morning working on something else. The non-transitive
extended community support is fairly messed up. In my case (set
ext-community rt 1:1) it causes the community to be skipped.
First of all the check in non_transitive_community() is messed up. It uses
the wrong data field, does a un
10 matches
Mail list logo
