On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:47:11AM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The return value of in6_pcbnotify() is never used. Make it a void
> function.
>
> ok?
>
ok mvs@
> bluhm
>
> Index: netinet/in_pcb.h
> ===
> RCS file: /da
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 01:41:10PM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:08:51AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 05:33:17PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 16:01:25 +0100
> > > > From: Anton Lindqvist
> > > >
>
> > > > r1p5 i
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:06:10AM +0100, Stefan Hagen wrote:
> Stefan Hagen wrote (2022-02-28 22:16 CET):
> > Theo de Raadt wrote (2022-02-28 18:02 CET):
> > > When you run sysupgrade, you want the firmwares matching what you are
> > > installing.
> > >
> > > The system you are running right now
Hi,
The return value of in6_pcbnotify() is never used. Make it a void
function.
ok?
bluhm
Index: netinet/in_pcb.h
===
RCS file: /data/mirror/openbsd/cvs/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.h,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -p -r1.122 in_pc
anyone had a chance to test this?
On 2022-02-24 18:38 +01, Florian Obser wrote:
> Upstream renamed parse_extract_edns to
> parse_extract_edns_from_response_msg and parse_edns_from_pkt to
> parse_edns_from_query_pkt in the upcomming libunbound 1.15.0
> update. Both funktions work equally well for
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 07:08:51AM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 05:33:17PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 16:01:25 +0100
> > > From: Anton Lindqvist
> > >
> > > r1p5 is revision 3 with a 32 bytes FIFO. My only concern is that the
> > > followi
Hi all,
I was looking into the code of ath, athn and otus to understand the
differences. I am wondering if these are fundamentally the same driver or
very different. I ask because if one was to port athn to FreeBSD I was
suggested to make QR9271 (athn) and extension of either ath or otus.
However,
On Tue, Mar 01 2022, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking at other things i noticed OpenVPN wasnt in /etc/services.
>
> apparently its listed/registered by IANA since 2004 (i know, not a reason),
> and
> i have it on a debian 11 box and on a FreeBSD 12.2 server.
>
> i see two reasons:
> -
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 10:41:14AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Probably best to wait a bit for other feedback, but: OK sthen
Ok from me, too. Some of my subnets are routed to me via OpenVPN so
I will be forced to keep using it for the foreseeable future.
I have $openvpn_port variables in som
On 2022/03/01 11:24, Landry Breuil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking at other things i noticed OpenVPN wasnt in /etc/services.
>
> apparently its listed/registered by IANA since 2004 (i know, not a reason),
> and
> i have it on a debian 11 box and on a FreeBSD 12.2 server.
>
> i see two reasons:
>
Hi,
while looking at other things i noticed OpenVPN wasnt in /etc/services.
apparently its listed/registered by IANA since 2004 (i know, not a reason), and
i have it on a debian 11 box and on a FreeBSD 12.2 server.
i see two reasons:
- making sure another service doesnt squat the port for outgoi
11 matches
Mail list logo