Joe Nelson wrote:
> I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper.
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html
>
> Is it missing because the community feels it's ill conceived, or just
> because nobody stepped up to implement it? If the latter, I can
> c
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 06:42:11PM -0700, Ted Bullock wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I've found some problems with the radeondrm initialization
> codepath (radeon_kms.c). Before I start, I should mention that I am
> working on some diffs to remove a bunch of the sparc64 MD ifdef's as
> well. In radeondrm_attac
Hey,
I've found some problems with the radeondrm initialization
codepath (radeon_kms.c). Before I start, I should mention that I am
working on some diffs to remove a bunch of the sparc64 MD ifdef's as
well. In radeondrm_attach_kms:
starting from line 545
==
#define RADEON_PCI_
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:30:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/02/11 16:13, Joe Nelson wrote:
> >
> > I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper.
> > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html
> >
> > Is it missing because the community fee
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 04:13:22PM -0600, Joe Nelson wrote:
>
> I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper.
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html
"[CD] C-Language Development Utilities 
The functionality described is optional."
I don't see the
On 2022/02/11 16:13, Joe Nelson wrote:
>
> I noticed that OpenBSD lacks the POSIX "c99" compiler wrapper.
> https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/c99.html
>
> Is it missing because the community feels it's ill conceived, or just
> because nobody stepped up to implement it? If
On 2022/02/11 11:19, Florian Obser wrote:
> I'm wondering if we need to sync, unfortunately the two files are
> not diffable :/
easy enough to transform, and the extensions and mimetypes are basically
in sync. here are the differences:
--- ours
+++ nginx
@@ -2 +1,0 @@ application/atom+xml atom
-a
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 04:53:59PM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:13:58AM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 07:32:38AM +0100, Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 07,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 11:19 AM, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2022-02-11 02:29 -07, "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote:
>> Jesse Alama writes:
>>> XSLT is a well-established XML-based language for stylesheets. It has been
>>> ar
>>> ound since the late 90s; the most recent version was finalized in 2017 (
I have some Dells that report various things in ipmi sensors that aren't
currently handled by ipmi(4) feeding to sysctl hw.sensors. It actually
has 100+ in all (visible in ipmitool); most are on/off indicators for
things including power good at various points, presence of various
cables, something
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 02:59:48PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> With the recent change to apm -m,
> reporting either the battery lifetime
> or the estimated time to charge (thank you),
> the manpage seems to have been left behind.
>
> While here, tweak some of the wording:
>
> - "in minutes" or "in
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 08:21:38 +0100, alf wrote:
> there seem to be some superfluous words in
> lib/libc/gen/statvfs.3 and sys/sys/statvfs.h .
> "(unit f_frsize)" can be removed since in the man page
> it is explicitely mentioned directly below:
> " The fields of type fsblkcnt_t are reported in unit
On 2022-02-11 02:29 -07, "Anthony J. Bentley" wrote:
> Jesse Alama writes:
>> XSLT is a well-established XML-based language for stylesheets. It has been ar
>> ound since the late 90s; the most recent version was finalized in 2017 (see
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/). The mime.types file bundl
Jesse Alama writes:
> XSLT is a well-established XML-based language for stylesheets. It has been ar
> ound since the late 90s; the most recent version was finalized in 2017 (see
> https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/). The mime.types file bundled with OpenBSD 7.0
> -- typically used with httpd -- does
On Feb 10 16:33:20, j...@juef.net wrote:
> (Thu, 10 Feb 14:59) Jan Stary:
> > With the recent change to apm -m,
> > reporting either the battery lifetime
> > or the estimated time to charge (thank you),
> > the manpage seems to have been left behind.
> >
> > While here, tweak some of the wording:
15 matches
Mail list logo