On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 00:45:56 +0100
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> I found scan-build to generate a lot of false warnings, so much indeed
> that i stopped using it .. in summer 2017.
You, and most others, (no sarcasm at all here) are much better
at C than I will ever be. I am not even at "amateur" le
Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 07:02:43PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > An unsinged TF_TIMER does not create that problem.
> >
> > Why don't you simply append an U suffix to TF_TMR_REXMT?
>
> There are a lot of TF_ flags. Ususally we dont put an U to hex
> flags. The only
Alexander Bluhm wrote in
:
|On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 05:59:24PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
|> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:44:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
|>> On 2022/01/14 16:52, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
|>>> On Fri Jan 14, 2022 at 03:17:21PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
| clang ships
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 05:59:24PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:44:49PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022/01/14 16:52, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > On Fri Jan 14, 2022 at 03:17:21PM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > clang ships with a pret
Disregard this one for now. If o_get returns -1 it indicates an error,
so it should indicate this to the upper layers. However, the old code
can't handle this and I kept this code as is so that we can have some
time to let the dust settle around the new code (and easily switch back
if needed). Chan
There's a missing NULL check in appl_response(). This should only happenwhen a
backend is misbehaving, so I only managed to find this because
I'm actively bashing it right now. This should make us a little more
future-proof. Code further down the path already has similar NULL checks
against this v
When hitting an error case in mps_get{,next}req, mps assumes that no OID
has been linked to the root element. However, in both the get as well as
the getnext case it's already set when entering the mib.c code, so going
the fail goto path will result in the intended OID/exception pair being
appended
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 07:02:43PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > An unsinged TF_TIMER does not create that problem.
>
> Why don't you simply append an U suffix to TF_TMR_REXMT?
There are a lot of TF_ flags. Ususally we dont put an U to hex
flags. The only one that is used for shifting is TF_TMR
Forgot to mention, I checked all the instances of ober_get_writebuf I
could find and they either don't use it for the actual length, or ber
has been freshly initialised just before. So there's no problem here in
the known consumers.
On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 18:50 +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> Whi
> An unsinged TF_TIMER does not create that problem.
Why don't you simply append an U suffix to TF_TMR_REXMT?
Hi,
TCP timers also shift undefined values.
kubsan: netinet/tcp_input.c:1027:4: shift: left shift of 67108864
by 5 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
The problem is hidden behind a bunch of macros:
TCP_SETUP_ACK(tp, tiflags, m);
#define TCP_SETUP_ACK(tp, tiflags
While reading through ber.c I noticed that ober_get_writebuf can return
the wrong length when called multiple times on the same ber instance.
This is because ober_get_writebuf uses br_wend to calculate the length,
while ober_write_elements uses that to determine the size of the buffer.
ober_write_
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 15:04:07 +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> snprintf(9) allows NULL pointer if size is 0. But doing NULL pointer
> arithmetic is undefined behavior. Check that size is positive
> before doing that. While the use NUL char for string termination.
>
> Pfkey import_flow() must do t
Hi,
snprintf(9) allows NULL pointer if size is 0. But doing NULL pointer
arithmetic is undefined behavior. Check that size is positive
before doing that. While the use NUL char for string termination.
Pfkey import_flow() must do the NULL check before doing pointer
calculations.
ok?
bluhm
In
This was from a sequence of early attempts to work towards a new
application layer. I can give more reasoning behind it, but the bottom
line is that it's currently dead weight.
OK to remove this code again?
martijn@
Index: snmpd.h
=
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:02:55PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Lets move the time validity checks for TA to cert.c. ta_parse already
> checks the pubkey so why not do all validity checks.
ok
> While doing that remove the code to extract the subject. All errors print
> the filename and the subje
Lets move the time validity checks for TA to cert.c. ta_parse already
checks the pubkey so why not do all validity checks.
While doing that remove the code to extract the subject. All errors print
the filename and the subject itself is just extra information that is less
helpful in the use case of
17 matches
Mail list logo