Hi all,
I have quad-port Intel ET2 NIC based on 82576[1] controller. The manual
says that hardware VLAN tagging should be supported but ifconfig output
shows VLAN_MTU only in hwfeatures on OpenBSD 7.0. How do I check if 802.1Q
tagging is offloaded or not? And if it's not - does it matter at 1Gbps
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> steven@ reported that, using xf68-video-nv X server 21.1 is dumping
> core on startup.
>
> The following patch fixes it. While here I also fixed another bug on
> drivers that don't intialize a private structure.
>
> If yo
Two things in sys_kbind() need an explicit kernel lock. First,
sigexit(). Second, uvm_map_extract(), because the following call
chain panics without it:
panic
assert
uvn_reference
uvm_mapent_clone
uum_map_extract
sys_kbind
syscall
Xsyscall
uvn_reference() does KERNEL_ASSERT_LOCKED().
These
On 2021/12/04 15:32, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> I tried the settings:
>
> inet 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 0.0.0.1 \
> pppoedev em0 authproto chap \
> authname 'testcaller' authkey 'secret' up
> !/sbin/route add default -ifp pppoe0 0.0.0.1
>
> But that didn't fixed my ICPC negotiation problem.
>
> If
On 2021-12-02 13:17, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 01:35:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Kanas wrote:
> > Hi. When remote side in sppp doesn't reply for to PPP IPCP IP-Address
> > sppp will try to negotiate remote IP in endless loop. Instead use
> > 10.64.64.1 + if_index as remote IP.
Hi,
steven@ reported that, using xf68-video-nv X server 21.1 is dumping
core on startup.
The following patch fixes it. While here I also fixed another bug on
drivers that don't intialize a private structure.
If you're using one older graphics card (ie not inteldrm or radeondrm
based), please t
Any other dev interested in fixing this? Feedback, suggestions, review?
Tim.
Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote:
> In my quick test, this works a lot better than what we have now. At
> least I get back more of the file I was working on. I also haven't been
> able to reproduce the annoying segfault and
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 02:03:29PM +, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I'm not yet ready to test new diffs, but I was going through old
> wireless stack related emails and was wondering did below patch got
> committed? Per my git / cvs search I don't think so. Is below diff
> still re
On Dec 04 14:28:23, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> On Dec 04 12:23:42, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > On Dec 01 09:07:43, h...@stare.cz wrote:
> > > > > > On 24/11/21(Wed) 11:16, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > > > Diff below unlock the bottom part of the UVM fault handler. I'm
> > > > > > > interested in squa
Hi Stefan,
I'm not yet ready to test new diffs, but I was going through old
wireless stack related emails and was wondering did below patch got
committed? Per my git / cvs search I don't think so. Is below diff
still relevant or can below change be ignored?
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 12:23:33PM +020
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 3:05 PM Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> An errata patch for rpki-client has been released for OpenBSD 6.9 [...]
It turns out that the 6.9 version of the patch (021_rpki) causes
rpki-client to provide OpenBGPd output that bgpd does not accept.
Specifically: bgpd on 6.9 does not ac
11 matches
Mail list logo